Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27343
Title: Health risks at work mean risks at home: Spatial aspects of COVID-19 among migrant workers in precarious jobs in England
Authors: Miles, S
Renedo, A
Kühlbrandt, C
McGowan, C
Stuart, R
Grenfell, P
Marston, C
Keywords: COVID-19;home;migrants;self-testing;space;vaccination;work
Issue Date: 20-Sep-2023
Publisher: Wiley on behalf of Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness
Citation: Miles, S. et al. (2023) 'Health risks at work mean risks at home: Spatial aspects of COVID-19 among migrant workers in precarious jobs in England', Sociology of Health and Illness, 0 (ahead-of-print), pp. 1 - 18. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13711.
Abstract: Copyright © 2023 The Authors. During COVID-19 lockdowns in England, ‘key workers’ including factory workers, carers and cleaners had to continue to travel to workplaces. Those in key worker jobs were often from more marginalised communities, including migrant workers in precarious employment. Recognising space as materially and socially produced, this qualitative study explores migrant workers’ experiences of navigating COVID-19 risks at work and its impacts on their home spaces. Migrant workers in precarious employment often described workplace COVID-19 protection measures as inadequate. They experienced work space COVID-19 risks as extending far beyond physical work boundaries. They developed their own protection measures to try to avoid infection and to keep the virus away from family members. Their protection measures included disinfecting uniforms, restricting leisure activities and physically separating themselves from their families. Inadequate workplace COVID-19 protection measures limited workers' ability to reduce risks. In future outbreaks, support for workers in precarious jobs should include free testing, paid sick leave and accommodation to allow for self-isolation to help reduce risks to workers’ families. Work environments should not be viewed as discrete risk spaces when planning response measures; responses and risk reduction approaches must also take into account impacts on workers’ lives beyond the workplace.
Description: Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27343
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13711
ISSN: 0141-9889
Other Identifiers: ORCID iDs: Sam Miles https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-1209; Alicia Renedo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7159-1723; Rachel Stuart https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-0073;
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.174.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.