Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27328
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYasseri, SF-
dc.contributor.authorBahai, H-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-08T08:49:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-08T08:49:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-01-
dc.identifierORCID iDs: Sirous Yasseri https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-9660; Hamid Bahai https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3476-9104.-
dc.identifier.citationYasseri, S.F. and Bahai, H. (2020) 'Case studies in estimating subsea systems’ readiness level', Underwater Technology, 37 (1), pp. 13 - 27. doi: 10.3723/ut.37.013.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1756-0543-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27328-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. Systems readiness level (SRL) is a metric defined for assessing progress in the development of systems. The methodologies to estimate SRLs are built on the technology readiness level (TRL), originally developed by NASA to assess the readiness of new technologies for insertion into a system. TRL was later adopted by governmental institutions and many industries, including the American Petroleum Institute (API). The TRL of each component is mathematically combined with another metric, integration readiness level (IRL), to estimate the overall level of readiness of a system. An averaging procedure is then used to estimate the composite level of systems readiness. The present paper builds on the previous paper by Yasseri (2013) and presents case examples to demonstrate the estimation of SRL using two approaches. The objective of the present paper is to show how the TRL, IRL, and SRL are combined mathematically. The performance of the methodology is also demonstrated in a parametric study by pushing the states of readiness to their extremes, namely very low and very high readiness. The present paper compares and contrasts the two major system readiness levels estimation methods: one proposed by Sauser et al. (2006) for defence acquisition based on NASA's TRL scale, and another based on API's TRL scale. The differences and similarities are demonstrated using a case study.en_US
dc.format.extent13 - 27-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSociety for Underwater Technologyen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Society for Underwater Technology. This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectsubsea production systemsen_US
dc.subjecttechnology readiness levelen_US
dc.subjectintegration readiness levelen_US
dc.subjectsystem readiness levelen_US
dc.subjectsystem maturityen_US
dc.titleCase studies in estimating subsea systems’ readiness levelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3723/ut.37.013-
dc.relation.isPartOfUnderwater Technology-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume37-
dc.identifier.eissn1756-0551-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Society for Underwater Technology. This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).1.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons