Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27143
Title: The investor-state arbitration legitimacy crisis: Could AI be its future savior (or resurrector)?
Authors: Dar, W
Praštalo, B
Keywords: artificial Intelligence;arbitration;decision making;investor-state dispute settlement;investor-state arbitration;veštačka inteligencija;arbitraža;odlučivanje;ISDS;investiciona arbitraža
Issue Date: 1-Jul-2023
Publisher: Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Citation: Dar, W. and Praštalo, B. (2023) 'The investor-state arbitration legitimacy crisis: Could AI be its future savior (or resurrector)?', Pravni zapisi, 14 (1), pp. 21 - 58. doi: 10.5937/pravzap1-43940.
Abstract: The world of arbitration has not escaped the all-pervading impact of AI. Stakeholders are not only assessing the current impact of AI on the practice of arbitration but also speculating on its future role. The possibility of AI replacing human arbitrators has also figured in the discussions. This paper focuses on the use of AI in the context of investor-State arbitration, which of late, has been facing fierce backlash for its purported deficiencies. The paper explores whether AI could be used to remedy some of the burning issues in the investor-state dispute settlement system, which have culminated in its "existential crisis". The paper assesses the extent to which human arbitrators and other relevant factors have contributed to the crisis, and then examines the suitability of AI to act as an arbitrator. The paper lays a road map for the potential role of AI in ISA and attempts to answer the central question-could AI prove to be a resurrector or a disruptor of the ISA system.
Sažetak: Sveobuhvatni uticaj veštačke inteligencije (VI) nije izuzeo ni arbitražu. Zainteresovane strane već nastoje ne samo da izuče trenutne posledice upotrebe veštačke inteligencije u arbitraži nego i da diskutuju o njenoj budućoj upotrebi. U raspravi se često može čuti o mogućnosti da VI u nekoj doglednoj budućnosti zameni čoveka u ulozi arbitra. Fokus ovog rada je na VI u kontekstu investicione arbitraže. Ovaj vid rešavanja sporova između država i investitora se suočava sa nizom kritika zbog svojih navodnih nedostataka. Cilj ovog članka je da ispita mogućnost upotrebe VI u budućnosti sa ciljem da se otklone navodni nedostaci zbog kojih danas mnogi govore o egzistencijalnoj krizi investicione arbitraže, ili krizi legitimiteta. U svetlu svega navedenog, ovaj rad prvo analizira doprinos kako ljudskog, tako i drugih faktora koji su doveli do krize legitimiteta. Zatim, rad ispituje podobnost VI da deluje u ulozi arbitra. Zaključci ovog rada će ne samo postaviti osnovne postulate za upotrebu VI u investicionoj arbitraži nego će dati i spekulativni stav o tome da li će VI na kraju iz korena izmeniti celi sistem investicione arbitraže.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27143
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap1-43940
ISSN: 2217-2815
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Boris Praštalo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8244-2512
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union. Published by Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES). This is an open access article under a Creative Commons (CC BY) Attribution Libcense (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).238.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons