Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27018
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHalder, R-
dc.contributor.authorYuen, TYP-
dc.contributor.authorChen, W-W-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, X-
dc.contributor.authorDeb, T-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, H-
dc.contributor.authorWen, T-H-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-21T20:44:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-21T20:44:18Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-17-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Xiangming Zhou https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7977-0718-
dc.identifier112984-
dc.identifier.citationHalder, R. et al. (2021) 'Tendon stress evaluation of unbonded post-tensioned concrete segmental bridges with two-variable response surfaces', Engineering Structures, 245, 112984, pp. 1 - 15. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112984.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27018-
dc.descriptionReferred to by: Corrigendum to “Tendon stress evaluation of unbonded post-tensioned concrete segmental bridges with two-variable response surfaces” [Eng. Struct. 245 (2021) 112984] Engineering Structures, Volume 247, 15 November 2021, Pages 113131 Rudhra Halder, Terry Y.P. Yuen, Wang-Wen Chen, Xiangming Zhou, Trissa Deb, Hexin Zhang, Tzu-Han Wen - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029621012657/pdfft?md5=246f2744618dd46c0ddcf4fe7d67a742&pid=1-s2.0-S0141029621012657-main.pdfen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper comprehensively studied the combined effects of prestress change and aspect ratios on the nonlinear structural performances of externally prestressed precast concrete segmental bridges (PCSB). An experimentally validated discrete-finite element model was adopted and various analytical cases were generated with variable span lengths. Furthermore, a simulation study is performed considering the change in prestress level to understand its effect on structural response, failure behaviour, and tendon stress at the ultimate limit state (ULS). The result showed that the stress in the unbonded tendon before the failure stage varies from 0.79 to 1.03fpy for the shorter tendon (T6L) and 0.66 to 0.94fpy for the longer tendon (T5L), and on comparing with the prediction of the existing codes, the stresses are highly underestimated. However, for the typical prestress level of around0.6 0.7fpu, the ACI318-19 code could quite well predict the ultimate tendon stress change. To establish the dependency of stress in the unbonded tendon at ULS to the normalized prestress factor (α) associated with the aspect ratio (L/d), the response surface methodology (RSM) was implemented. The mediocre prediction of one- variable linear regression analysis concludes the dependency of the combined effects of the two variables on the response variables. The 3rd order two-variable response surfaces were able to predict an increase in stress and total stress of tendon at the ULS with high goodness-of-fit values of 0.97 and 0.92 respectively.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to express their gratitude for the funding support by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), R.O.C. under Grand Numbers 109-2636-E-009 -015-, 110-2221-E-A49 -133 -.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 15-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 Elsevier. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112984, made available on this repository under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectprecast concrete segmental bridgeen_US
dc.subjectexternally unbonded tendonen_US
dc.subjectdiscrete finite element modelen_US
dc.subjectresponse surface methodologyen_US
dc.subjectprestress changeen_US
dc.titleTendon stress evaluation of unbonded post-tensioned concrete segmental bridges with two-variable response surfacesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112984-
dc.relation.isPartOfEngineering Structures-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume245-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7323-
dc.rights.holderElsevier-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2021 Elsevier. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112984, made available on this repository under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).5.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Corrigendum.pdf771.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons