Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26511
Title: A Quiet Victory: National Provincial, Gibson Hall, and the Switch from Comprehensive Redevelopment to Urban Preservation in 1960s London
Authors: Barnes, V
Newton, L
Scott, P
Issue Date: 16-Nov-2022
Publisher: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference
Citation: Barnes, V., Newton, L. and Scott, P. (2022) 'A Quiet Victory: National Provincial, Gibson Hall, and the Switch from Comprehensive Redevelopment to Urban Preservation in 1960s London', Enterprise and Society, 23 (1), pp. 33 - 67. doi: 10.1017/eso.2020.35.
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. The Victorian City of London’s financial center expanded and renewed its building infrastructure virtually unimpeded by considerations of urban preservation, conservation, or public opinion. The next phase of massive rebuilding, during the long post-1945 boom, appeared likely to follow the same pattern. However, by the mid-1960s, the freedom of City office owner-occupiers and developers to do as they wished with their buildings had become substantially constrained by rising conservationist sentiment. This paper explores this process through the history of the design, building, and eventual aborted demolition of Gibson Hall, the Bishopsgate headquarters of National Provincial Bank for over a century. This paper charts the life of Gibson Hall, in particular its conception, design, and, ultimately, its attempted redevelopment. We also consider the long-term consequences of the rebalancing between economic and conservation objectives for the nature of British urban redevelopment and the adoption of a “throwaway” business headquarters style—to remove any risk of popular support for preservation.
Description: Footnote: We would like to thank the partipicants at the ABH conference in Glasgow in 2017 for their comments on the paper, Grigorij Tschernjawskyj and Marc Di Tommasi for their research assistance, Sally Cholewa at RBS archives and the staff at the London Metropolitan Archives for their help and assistance, and three anonymous referees for their suggestions. Figures 3 and 4 are reproduced with the permission of the National Library of Scotland and 5 and 6 with the permission of RBS.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26511
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2020.35
ISSN: 1467-2227
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial reuse or in order to create a derivative work.1.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons