Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26510
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, V-
dc.contributor.authorDe Pascalis, F-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-24T11:01:33Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-24T11:01:33Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-17-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Francesco De Pascalis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5318-6465-
dc.identifier.citationBarnes, V. and De Pascalis, F. (2023) 'R v Natwest (2021): Another turning point in the regulation of big banks?', The Company Lawyer, 44 (5), pp. 143 - 151. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I34165430D99011ED9A5BA25F1939BE9E/View/FullText.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.issn0144-1027-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26510-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines R v NatWest, which made headline news for the record fine given to NatWest following allegations of money laundering. This is a first for banking history. The facts themselves are equally remarkable. The analysis conducted in this article proffers some insights into how such activity persisted. Such a discussion shows how unusual the events were in the context of banking history. A contextualized overview of the growth of NatWest has much to offer those interested in the culture and the internal processes within the bank, which lead to a breach of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007. The present case offers numerous points for reflection. Such a comprehensive analysis is worth undertaking not only because of the historical shifts that can be observed in the banking industry though R v NatWest. It shows how some of the tensions in this case are age-old, but, equally, that the decision here has important implications for the future of banking and financial law.en_US
dc.format.extent143 - 151-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 Sweet and Maxwell. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review, made available under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC) Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). The definitive published version [insert complete citation information here] is available online on Westlaw UK. Available at [URL] (see: https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/terms/journals-access-policy.htm).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectbankers' dutiesen_US
dc.subjectbanksen_US
dc.subjectFinancial Conduct Authorityen_US
dc.subjectfinesen_US
dc.subjectmoney launderingen_US
dc.subjectbig business-
dc.subjectbanking-
dc.subjectbank regulation-
dc.subjectfinancial history-
dc.subjectcorporate governance-
dc.titleR v Natwest (2021): Another turning point in the regulation of big banks?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfThe Company Lawyer-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume44-
dc.identifier.eissn2754-2262-
dc.rights.holderSweet and Maxwell-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed until 17 April 2024335.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons