Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26483
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCoyne, E-
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, J-
dc.contributor.authorLoud, F-
dc.contributor.authorBristow, P-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, HML-
dc.contributor.authorCastle, EM-
dc.contributor.authorLightfoot, CJ-
dc.contributor.authorGraham-Brown, M-
dc.contributor.authorEyre, M-
dc.contributor.authorOrmandy, P-
dc.contributor.authorSachar, A-
dc.contributor.authorBevin, A-
dc.contributor.authorBurton, JO-
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, TJ-
dc.contributor.authorKoufaki, P-
dc.contributor.authorMacdonald, J-
dc.contributor.authorAshman, N-
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, SA-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-22T10:40:31Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-22T10:40:31Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-19-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Ellen M Castle https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-6108-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Pelagia Koufaki https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1406-3729-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Sharlene A Greenwood https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9485-4645-
dc.identifier.citationCoyne, E. et al. (2023) 'Achieving consensus on psychosocial and physical rehabilitation management for people living with kidney disease', Clinical Kidney Journal, 16 (11), pp. 2185 - 2193. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad116.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2048-8505-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26483-
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Background People living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) need to be able to live well with their condition. The provision of psychosocial interventions (psychological, psychiatric, and social care) and physical rehabilitation management is variable across England, as well as the rest of the United Kingdom. There is a need for clear recommendations for standards of psychosocial and physical rehabilitation care for people living with CKD, and guidance for the commissioning and measurement of these services. The NHS England Renal Services Transformation Programme (RSTP) supported a programme of work and modified Delphi process to address the management of psychosocial and physical rehabilitation care as part of a larger body of work to formulate a comprehensive commissioning toolkit for renal care services across England. We sought to achieve expert consensus regarding the psychosocial and physical rehabilitation management of people living with CKD in England and the rest of the UK. Method A Delphi consensus method was used to gather and refine expert opinions of senior members of the kidney multi-disciplinary team (MDT) and other key stakeholders in the UK. An agreement was sought on 16 statements reflecting aspects of psychosocial and physical rehabilitation management for people living with CKD. Results Twenty-six expert practitioners and other key stakeholders, including lived experience representatives, participated in the process. The consensus (>80% affirmative votes) amongst the respondents for all 16 statements was high. Nine recommendation statements were discussed and refined further to be included in the final iteration of the ‘Systems’ section of the NHS England RSTP commissioning toolkit. These priority recommendations reflect pragmatic solutions that can be implemented in renal care and include recommendations for a holistic well-being assessment for all people living with CKD who are approaching dialysis, or who are at listing for kidney transplantation, which includes the use of validated measurement tools to assess the need for further intervention in psychosocial and physical rehabilitation management. It is recommended that the scores from these measurement tools be included in the NHS England Renal Data Dashboard. There was also a recommendation for referral as appropriate to NHS Talking therapies, psychology, counselling or psychotherapy, social work or liaison psychiatry for those with identified psychosocial needs. The use of digital resources was recommended to be used in addition to face-to-face care to provide physical rehabilitation, and all healthcare professionals should be educated to recognise psychosocial and physical rehabilitation needs and refer/sign-post people with CKD to appropriate services. Conclusion There was high consensus amongst senior members of the kidney MDT and other key stakeholders, including those with lived experience, in the UK on all aspects of the psychosocial and physical rehabilitation management of people living with CKD. The results of this process will be used by NHS England to inform the ‘Systems’ section of the commissioning toolkit and data dashboard and to inform the National Standards of Care for people living with CKD.en_US
dc.format.extent2185 - 2193-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press on behalf of the ERAen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectCKDen_US
dc.subjectexerciseen_US
dc.subjectphysical activityen_US
dc.subjectpsychosocialen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.titleAchieving consensus on psychosocial and physical rehabilitation management for people living with kidney diseaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad116-
dc.relation.isPartOfClinical Kidney Journal-
pubs.issue11-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume16-
dc.identifier.eissn2048-8513-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com703.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com686.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons