Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26421
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartyr, A-
dc.contributor.authorNelis, SM-
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, C-
dc.contributor.authorWu, YT-
dc.contributor.authorLamont, RA-
dc.contributor.authorHenderson, C-
dc.contributor.authorClarke, R-
dc.contributor.authorHindle, JV-
dc.contributor.authorThom, JM-
dc.contributor.authorJones, IR-
dc.contributor.authorMorris, RG-
dc.contributor.authorRusted, JM-
dc.contributor.authorVictor, CR-
dc.contributor.authorClare, L-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-08T14:28:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-08T14:28:12Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationMartyr, A. et al. (2021) 'Erratum: Living well with dementia: a systematic review and correlational meta-analysis of factors associated with quality of life, well-being and life satisfaction in people with dementia - CORRIGENDUM (Psychological medicine (2018) 48 13 (2130-2139))', Psychological medicine, 51 (9), pp. 1590 - 1590. doi:10.1017/S0033291720001713.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26421-
dc.descriptionCorrigendumen_US
dc.descriptionOroginal article published 8 May 2018. Citation: Martyr, A. et al. (2018) 'Living well with dementia: A systematic review and correlational meta-analysis of factors associated with quality of life, well-being and life satisfaction in people with dementia', Psychological Medicine, 48(13), pp. 2130-2139. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000405.-
dc.description.abstractTwo errors have been identified in the analysis reported in the above article. Figure 1: The number of studies included in quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) was 198 rather than 199. Figure 2: The authors reanalysed data for “Presence of religious beliefs/spirituality” as it was noticed that three data points were entered into the meta-analysis software with incorrect direction. The meta-analysis effect size originally reported was r = 0.35 (95% CI 0.12, 0.55), p = .0035, I 2 = 88.453, (I 2 was included in Supplementary Table 13a only). Reanalysis indicated a correct effect size of: r = 0.15 (−0.12, 0.15), p = .8280, I 2 = 62.101. Therefore, presence of religious beliefs/spirituality had a negligible association with better quality of life, rather than a moderate association as originally stated (p.2134). The authors apologise for these errors.en_US
dc.format.extent1590 - 1590-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © Cambridge University Press 2020. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.titleErratum: Living well with dementia: a systematic review and correlational meta-analysis of factors associated with quality of life, well-being and life satisfaction in people with dementia - CORRIGENDUM (Psychological medicine (2018) 48 13 (2130-2139))en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001713-
dc.relation.isPartOfPsychological medicine-
pubs.issue9-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume51-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-8978-
dc.rights.holderCambridge University Press / The Authors-
Appears in Collections:Institute of Health, Medicine and Environments

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Corrigendum.pdfCopyright © Cambridge University Press 2020. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.65.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons