Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26309
Title: The effect of a novel, digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention on health-related quality of life in people with chronic kidney disease: trial design and baseline data from a multicentre prospective, wait-list randomised controlled trial (Kidney BEAM).
Authors: Walklin, CG
Young, HML
Asghari, E
Bhandari, S
Billany, RE
Bishop, N
Bramham, K
Briggs, J
Burton, JO
Campbell, J
Castle, EM
Chilcot, J
Cooper, N
Deelchand, V
Graham-Brown, MPM
Hamilton, A
Jesky, M
Kalra, PA
Koufaki, P
Macafferty, K
Nixon, AC
Noble, H
Saynor, ZL
Sothinathan, C
Taal, MW
Tollitt, J
Wheeler, DC
Wilkinson, TJ
Macdonald, JH
Greenwood, SA
Keywords: KDQoL-SF;SF-36;e-health;telemedicine;digital health;mixed-methods;quality of life
Issue Date: 2-May-2023
Publisher: BMC (part of Springer Nature)
Citation: Walklin, C.G. et al. (2023) 'The effect of a novel, digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention on health-related quality of life in people with chronic kidney disease: trial design and baseline data from a multicentre prospective, wait-list randomised controlled trial (Kidney BEAM).', BMC Nephrology, 24 (1), 122, pp. 1 - 17. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03173-7.
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s) 2023. Background: Physical activity and emotional self-management has the potential to enhance health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but few people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have access to resources and support. The Kidney BEAM trial aims to evaluate whether an evidence-based physical activity and emotional wellbeing self-management programme (Kidney BEAM) leads to improvements in HRQoL in people with CKD. Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, randomised waitlist-controlled trial, with health economic analysis and nested qualitative studies. In total, three hundred and four adults with established CKD were recruited from 11 UK kidney units. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (Kidney BEAM) or a wait list control group (1:1). The primary outcome was the between-group difference in Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQoL) mental component summary score (MCS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the KDQoL physical component summary score, kidney-specific scores, fatigue, life participation, depression and anxiety, physical function, clinical chemistry, healthcare utilisation and harms. All outcomes were measured at baseline and 12 weeks, with long-term HRQoL and adherence also collected at six months follow-up. A nested qualitative study explored experience and impact of using Kidney BEAM. Results: 340 participants were randomised to Kidney BEAM (n = 173) and waiting list (n = 167) groups. There were 96 (55%) and 89 (53%) males in the intervention and waiting list groups respectively, and the mean (SD) age was 53 (14) years in both groups. Ethnicity, body mass, CKD stage, and history of diabetes and hypertension were comparable across groups. The mean (SD) of the MCS was similar in both groups, 44.7 (10.8) and 45.9 (10.6) in the intervention and waiting list groups respectively. Conclusion: Results from this trial will establish whether the Kidney BEAM self management programme is a cost-effective method of enhancing mental and physical wellbeing of people with CKD. Trial Registration: NCT04872933. Registered 5th May 2021.
Description: Data Availability: Findings from the study will be disseminated at national and international conferences. All baseline data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://bmcnephrol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12882-023-03173-7#Sec51 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26309
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03173-7
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Ellen M Castle https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-6108
122
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.1.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons