Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26146
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDandan, L-
dc.contributor.authorWang, B-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Y-
dc.contributor.authorGrigg, S-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-14T18:20:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-14T18:20:58Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-10-
dc.identifierORCID iDs: Bin Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-6599; Han Yang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9785-064X; Stephen Grigg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5317-7139.-
dc.identifier3018-
dc.identifier.citationDandan, L. et al. (2023) 'A Comparison of Two Types of Acoustic Emission Sensors for the Characterization of Hydrogen-Induced Cracking', Sensors, 23 (6), 3018, pp. 1 - 16. doi:en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26146-
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2023 by the authors. Acoustic emission (AE) technology is a non-destructive testing (NDT) technique that is able to monitor the process of hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC). AE uses piezoelectric sensors to convert the elastic waves generated from the growth of HIC into electric signals. Most piezoelectric sensors have resonance and thus are effective for a certain frequency range, and they will fundamentally affect the monitoring results. In this study, two commonly used AE sensors (Nano30 and VS150-RIC) were used for monitoring HIC processes using the electrochemical hydrogen-charging method under laboratory conditions. Obtained signals were analyzed and compared on three aspects, i.e., in signal acquisition, signal discrimination, and source location to demonstrate the influences of the two types of AE sensors. A basic reference for the selection of sensors for HIC monitoring is provided according to different test purposes and monitoring environments. Results show that signal characteristics from different mechanisms can be identified more clearly by Nano30, which is conducive to signal classification. VS150-RIC can identify HIC signals better and provide source locations more accurately. It can also acquire low-energy signals better, which is more suitable for monitoring over a long distance.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipLloyd’s Register Foundation; Brunel University London.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 16-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.subjecthydrogen-induced crackingen_US
dc.subjectsensor typeen_US
dc.subjectNano30en_US
dc.subjectVS150-RICen_US
dc.subjectsignal characteristicsen_US
dc.subjectsource locationen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Two Types of Acoustic Emission Sensors for the Characterization of Hydrogen-Induced Crackingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s23063018-
dc.relation.isPartOfSensors-
pubs.issue6-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume23-
dc.identifier.eissn1424-8220-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).6.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.