Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25970
Title: The differences in antibiotic decision-making between acute surgical and acute medical teams: An ethnographic study of culture and team dynamics
Authors: Charani, E
Ahmad, R
Rawson, TM
Castro-Sanchèz, E
Tarrant, C
Holmes, AH
Keywords: antimicrobial decision-making;culture;team dynamics
Issue Date: 15-Nov-2018
Publisher: Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America
Citation: Charani, E. et al. (2019) 'The differences in antibiotic decision-making between acute surgical and acute medical teams: An ethnographic study of culture and team dynamics', Clinical Infectious Diseases, 69 (1), pp. 12 - 20. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy844.
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Background. Cultural and social determinants influence antibiotic decision-making in hospitals. We investigated and compared cultural determinants of antibiotic decision-making in acute medical and surgical specialties. Methods. An ethnographic observational study of antibiotic decision-making in acute medical and surgical teams at a London teaching hospital was conducted (August 2015-May 2017). Data collection included 500 hours of direct observations, and face-toface interviews with 23 key informants. A grounded theory approach, aided by Nvivo 11 software, analyzed the emerging themes. An iterative and recursive process of analysis ensured saturation of the themes. The multiple modes of enquiry enabled cross-validation and triangulation of the findings. Results. In medicine, accepted norms of the decision-making process are characterized as collectivist (input from pharmacists, infectious disease, and medical microbiology teams), rationalized, and policy-informed, with emphasis on de-escalation of therapy. The gaps in antibiotic decision-making in acute medicine occur chiefly in the transition between the emergency department and inpatient teams, where ownership of the antibiotic prescription is lost. In surgery, team priorities are split between 3 settings: operating room, outpatient clinic, and ward. Senior surgeons are often absent from the ward, leaving junior staff to make complex medical decisions. This results in defensive antibiotic decision-making, leading to prolonged and inappropriate antibiotic use. Conclusions. In medicine, the legacy of infection diagnosis made in the emergency department determines antibiotic decision- making. In surgery, antibiotic decision-making is perceived as a nonsurgical intervention that can be delegated to junior staff or other specialties. Different, bespoke approaches to optimize antibiotic prescribing are therefore needed to address these specific challenges.
Description: Supplementary Data: Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online at: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/69/1/12/5174860#supplementary-data. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25970
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy844
ISSN: 1058-4838
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Enrique Castro-Sánchez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-9496
Appears in Collections:Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.3.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons