Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25798
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, A-
dc.contributor.authorRiesch, H-
dc.contributor.authorStephens, N-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-17T14:57:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-17T14:57:30Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-12-
dc.identifierORCID iDs: Jamie Lewis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1065-6017; Andrew Bartlett https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-0899; Hauke Riesch https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-9046; Neil Stephens https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3871-0887.-
dc.identifier.citationLewis, J. et al. (2023) ‘Why we need a Public Understanding of Social Science’, Public Understanding of Science, 32 (5). pp. 658 - 672. doi: 10.1177/09636625221141862.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0963-6625-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25798-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Who is licensed to make knowledge claims about society? A more diffuse group of individuals are afforded the status of legitimate speakers on society in the public sphere than is the case when the questions relate to the expertise of the natural sciences. We draw on the concept of the ‘locus of legitimate interpretation’ and the sensibilities of Collins and Evans’ Studies of Expertise and Experience programme to help make sense of these issues. The social sciences are not the natural sciences, and one key difference is their relationship with publics. The social sciences are intrinsically entangled, at both the level of the research question and the research subject/object, with public knowledge, the knowledges of publics and public interests. We therefore outline what these differences might mean for a serious, distinct and purposive Public Understanding of Social Science programme and how this differs from current work in the Public Understanding of Science.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.-
dc.format.extent658 - 672-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectLocus of legitimate interpretationen_US
dc.subjectPublic Understanding of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectpublicsen_US
dc.subjectPublic Understanding of Social Scienceen_US
dc.subjectsociologyen_US
dc.titleWhy we need a public understanding of social scienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221141862-
dc.relation.isPartOfPublic Understanding of Science-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume32-
dc.identifier.eissn1361-6609-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).219.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons