Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25781
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhu, NJ-
dc.contributor.authorFerlie, EB-
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Sánchez, E-
dc.contributor.authorBirgand, G-
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, AH-
dc.contributor.authorAtun, RA-
dc.contributor.authorKieltyka, H-
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, R-
dc.contributor.authorthe COMPASS (COntrol-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-14T16:18:33Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-14T16:18:33Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-31-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Enrique Castro-Sánchez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-9496-
dc.identifier05012-
dc.identifier.citationZhu, N.J. et al. on behalf of the COMPASS (COntrol and Management of PAndemicS through Strategic analysis) study group )2021) 'Macro level factors influencing strategic responses to emergent pandemics: A scoping review', Journal of Global Health, 11, 05012, pp. 1 - 16. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.05012.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2047-2978-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25781-
dc.description.abstractCopyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Background Strategic planning is critical for successful pandemic management. This study aimed to identify and review the scope and analytic depth of situation analyses conducted to understand their utility, and capture the documented macro-level factors impacting pandemic management. Methods To synthesise this disparate body of literature, we adopted a two-step search and review process. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify all studies since 2000, that have 1) employed a situation analysis; and 2) examined contextual factors influencing pandemic management. The included studies are analysed using a seven-domain systems approach from the discipline of strategic management. Results Nineteen studies were included in the final review ranging from single country (6) to regional, multi-country studies (13). Fourteen studies had a single disease focus, with 5 studies evaluating responses to one or more of COVID-19, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Influenza A (H1N1), Ebola virus disease, and Zika virus disease pandemics. Six studies examined a single domain from political, economic, sociological, technological, ecological or wider industry (PESTELI), 5 studies examined two to four domains, and 8 studies examined five or more domains. Methods employed were predominantly literature reviews. The recommendations focus predominantly on addressing inhibitors in the sociological and technological domains with few recommendations articulated in the political domain. Overall, the legislative domain is least represented. Conclusions Ex-post analysis using the seven-domain strategic management framework provides further opportunities for a planned systematic response to pandemics which remains critical as the current COVID-19 pandemic evolves.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study did not receive any external funding.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 16-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInternational Society of Global Healthen_US
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by International Society of Global Health under a Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) Attribution Licence..-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode-
dc.titleMacro level factors influencing strategic responses to emergent pandemics: A scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.05012-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Global Health-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume11-
dc.identifier.eissn2047-2986-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons