Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25710
Title: Beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccinations of young adults in the United Kingdom: An interview study applying the Integrated Change Model
Other Titles: PLOS
Authors: van Bergen, I
Böger, S
Beaudart, C
Hiligsmann, M
Cheung, KL
Keywords: vaccination and immunization;COVID 19;medical risk factors;vaccines;vaccine development;young adults;viral vaccines;blood
Issue Date: 6-Dec-2022
Citation: van Bergen, I. et al. (2022) 'Beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccinations of young adults in the United Kingdom: An interview study applying the Integrated Change Model', PLoS One, 17 (12), e0277109, pp. 1 - 19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277109.
Abstract: Copyright: © 2022 van Bergen et al. Introduction: Young adults are considered one of the most hesitant groups towards getting vaccinated in the UK, which threatens the success of the vaccination program in ending the pandemic. Identifying and understanding the socio-cognitive beliefs is important to effectively design and implement health communication interventions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the underlying beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccinations among young adults in the UK. Methods: The study consisted of online, one-on-one interviews with 18 individuals (6 males, 12 females) aged between 18 and 29 years, conducted in June 2021. The guiding theoretical framework was the I-Change Model. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were independently coded by two researchers by using the constructs of the I-Change Model. Belief statements were elicited from the codes and the frequency of belief statements was recorded and compared between intenders and non-intenders. Results: Similar beliefs were observed in intenders and non-intenders for most constructs of the I-Change Model. However, non-intenders distinguished themselves from intenders by their higher perceived risks of side effects and higher perceived disadvantages of being vaccinated. Non-intenders expressed the belief that the risk of unknown or long-term side effects, such as blood clotting and impact on fertility, were the main reason for them not to be willing to vaccinate. In addition, in both groups, participants had mostly similar beliefs as their friends and family. Conclusion: This research provides insights in the specific beliefs of the young adult population of the UK regarding COVID-19 vaccinations, which could have implications for health communication interventions. The findings suggest that such interventions should focus on reducing the uncertainty regarding short- and long-term effects and potentially having a focus on the entire social environment of young adults.
Description: Data Availability: All relevant data are available from the figshare repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21548031).
Supporting information: S1 File. Interview guide. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277109.s001 (DOCX); S2 File. Coding guide. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277109.s002 (DOCX); S3 File. Inclusivity in global research questionnaire. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277109.s003 (DOCX); S1 Fig. Awareness phase beliefs. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277109.s004 (TIF); S2 Fig. Motivation phase beliefs. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277109.s005 (TIF); S3 Fig. Action phase beliefs. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277109.s006 (TIF).
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25710
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277109
Other Identifiers: ORCID iDs: Ilje van Bergen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0617-5421; Kei Long Cheung https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-4556.
e0277109
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright: © 2022 van Bergen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.450.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons