Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25661
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVandrevala, T-
dc.contributor.authorHendy, J-
dc.contributor.authorHanson, K-
dc.contributor.authorAlidu, L-
dc.contributor.authorAla, A-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T18:43:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-19T18:43:02Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-17-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Jane Hendy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1472-7548-
dc.identifier.citationVandrevala, T. et al. (2022) 'Unpacking COVID-19 and conspiracy theories in the UK black community', British Journal of Health Psychology, 28 (2), pp. 482 - 498. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12636.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1359-107X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25661-
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Objectives: Conspiracy theories are associated with significant COVID-19 health consequences including lower engagement with protective behaviours. This study uses sensemaking theory, a process of constructing meanings through interpersonal exchanges that enable people to interpret their world to explain the theoretical process underlying the development of conspiratorial beliefs around COVID-19 within Black African and Caribbean communities in the UK. Design: Qualitative, in-depth interviews were used. Methods: Twenty-eight members of the communities were recruited: semi-structured interviews were analysed using grounded theory. Results: Our findings provide an explanation of how an environment of crisis combined with current and historical mistrust, perceived injustice and inequality provided a context in which alternative conspiracy narratives could thrive. The nature of these conspiratorial beliefs made more sense to many of our respondent's than institutional sources (such as the UK Government). Critically, these alternative beliefs helped respondents shape their decision-making, leading to non-engagement with COVID protective behaviours. Conclusions: We conclude that the uncertainty of the pandemic, combined with historical and contemporary perceived injustice and mistrust, and a lack of specific identity-aligned messaging, created a perfect environment for conspiratorial sense-making to thrive. This alternative sensemaking was inconsistent with the health-protection messaging espoused by the Government. To ensure all groups in society are protected, and for health promotion messages to take purchase, the experiences of different target audiences must be taken into account, with sensemaking anchored in lived experience.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIHR/UKRI. Grant Numbers: NIHR COV0143, UKRI MC_PC_20013.en_US
dc.format.extent482 - 498-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectblacken_US
dc.subjectconspiracy theoryen_US
dc.subjectCOVIDen_US
dc.subjectethnicen_US
dc.subjectsense makingen_US
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.titleUnpacking COVID-19 and conspiracy theories in the UK black communityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12636-
dc.relation.isPartOfBritish Journal of Health Psychology-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume28-
dc.identifier.eissn2044-8287-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.450.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons