Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25558
Title: Equality and diversity in secondary schools: teachers’ agentic and constrained enactments of the curriculum
Authors: Lebbakhar, A
Hoskins, K
Chappell, A
Keywords: equality;diversity;the national curriculum;policy enactment;teachers’ experiences;agency
Issue Date: 14-Dec-2022
Publisher: UCL Press
Citation: Lebbakhar, A., Hoskins, K. and Chappell, A. (2022) 'Equality and diversity in secondary schools: teachers’ agentic and constrained enactments of the curriculum', London Review of Education, 22 (1), pp. 1 - 14. doi: 10.14324/LRE.20.1.49.
Abstract: Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). n England educators have been concerned about ensuring equality and diversity in education due to ever-diversifying school populations, who find themselves positioned as outsiders to England’s National Curriculum. This article explores the accessibility and limitations of the curriculum from the perspective of ten secondary school teachers in nine different subjects in inner city state schools. We begin by examining the participants’ goals and aims when enacting the curriculum to make it accessible to all students. However, the prescriptive nature of the curriculum in most subjects makes this task challenging. We then examine how participants perceived that they enabled students’ access to the curriculum and the challenges encountered. We focus on art and English to highlight the different spaces to enact equality and diversity within the curriculum. In the nonprescriptive art curriculum, teachers choose their own resources and themes, allowing for greater creativity and cultural inclusivity. In contrast, in the English curriculum, teachers find the process of equalising and diversifying the curriculum difficult, particularly at Key Stage 4, due to the high status of the subject. To conclude, we argue that the more prescriptive a curriculum subject is, the more difficult it is to make it equal, diverse and inclusive of everyone.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.20.1.49
ISSN: 1474-8460
Other Identifiers: ORCID iDs: Kate Hoskins https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6360-8898; Anne Chappell https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-2413.
Appears in Collections:Dept of Education Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.20.1.49.282.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons