Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25169
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhalambaz, M-
dc.contributor.authorEisapour, AH-
dc.contributor.authorMohammed, HI-
dc.contributor.authorIslam, MS-
dc.contributor.authorYounis, O-
dc.contributor.authorSardari, PT-
dc.contributor.authorYaïci, W-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-07T14:00:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-07T14:00:38Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-26-
dc.identifier1289-
dc.identifier.citationGhalambaz, M. et al. (2021) 'Impact of Tube Bundle Placement on the Thermal Charging of a Latent Heat Storage Unit', Energies, 14 (5), 1289, pp. 1 - 14. doi: 10.3390/en14051289.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25169-
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: The data will be available on request.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. The melting process of a multi-tube’s thermal energy storage system in the existence of free convection effects is a non-linear and important problem. The placement of heated tubes could change the convective thermal circulation. In the present study, the impact of the position of seven heat exchanger tubes was systematically investigated. The energy charging process was numerically studied utilizing liquid fraction and stored energy with exhaustive temperature outlines. The tubes of heat transfer fluid were presumed in the unit with different locations. The unit’s heat transfer behavior was assessed by studying the liquid fraction graphs, streamlines, and isotherm contours. Each of the design factors was divided into four levels. To better investigate the design space for the accounted five variables and four levels, an L16 orthogonal table was considered. Changing the location of tubes could change the melting rate by 28%. The best melting rate was 94% after four hours of charging. It was found that the tubes with close distance could overheat each other and reduce the total heat transfer. The study of isotherms and streamlines showed the general circulation of natural convection flows at the final stage of melting was the most crucial factor in the melting of top regions of the unit and reduces the charging time. Thus, particular attention to the tubes’ placement should be made so that the phase change material could be quickly melted at both ends of a unit.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: This research received no external funding.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 14-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectphase change materialen_US
dc.subjectmeltingen_US
dc.subjectlatent heat thermal energy storageen_US
dc.subjectheat tube placementen_US
dc.titleImpact of Tube Bundle Placement on the Thermal Charging of a Latent Heat Storage Uniten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/en14051289-
dc.relation.isPartOfEnergies-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume14-
dc.identifier.eissn1996-1073-
dc.rights.holderThe authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.19.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons