Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25145
Title: Development of Intrinsic Seismic Vulnerability Index (ISVI) for assessing roadway system and its assets framework
Authors: El‐Maissi, AM
Argyroudis, SA
Kassem, MM
Mohamed Nazri, F
Keywords: intrinsic seismic vulnerability index;accessibility index;disaster risk reduction;resilient infrastructure;vulnerability assessment;critical service centers
Issue Date: 19-Aug-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Citation: El‐Maissi, A.M. et al. (2022) ‘Development of Intrinsic Seismic Vulnerability Index (ISVI) for assessing roadway system and its assets framework’, MethodsX. Elsevier BV. pp. 1 - 14., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101818.
Abstract: Roadway systems and their assets are the backbone of the transport sector and are vital for social and economic prosperity. Hence, it is important to design and develop transportation networks that can withstand natural hazards such as earthquakes. In recent decades, research concerning disaster risk management for roadway systems has received a lot of attention, particularly via the use of seismic vulnerability assessment methods. The majority of those models focus on a single criterion e.g., physical degradation of road assets, traffic disturbance, and/or functionality loss of the network, rather than considering how different criteria interact, such as association between asset damage, functionality, and network traffic. The main purpose of this study is to provide an integrated methodology for evaluating the seismic vulnerability of road networks to inform decision-making for risk mitigation. The proposed framework correlates the Intrinsic Seismic Vulnerability Index (ISVI) scores with the variation of accessibility rates to critical service centers. The methodology is demonstrated through an application to a part of a road network for specific seismic scenarios. The ISVI quantifies the impact caused by a parameter’s physical performance on the road behaviour using Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis (NLDA) technique, which can reduce or limit the role of the studies that are based on expert opinion decisions. The validated results shows that the embankment height is considered the most effective parameter in the physical assessment approach, followed by the number of lanes, while the soil type and pavement strength are the least effective parameters with a better effectiveness for soil type compared to pavement strength. Additionally, the integration between the physical assessment approach and the analysed accessibility rates is clearly showing compatibility between the vulnerability and accessibility approach, demonstrating more precise assessment tool by considering the correlation between the vulnerability rates and the reduced accessibility levels. The proposed approach can assist infrastructure owners and operators to reduce risk and boost emergency accessibility. • Conducting ISVI for roadway and its assets based on physical damage approach. • Assessing road networks accessibility rates by introducing an accessibility index (AI) using different geographical aspects • Formulating an integrated model between physical damage and traffic accessibility through building transport performance maps.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25145
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101818
Other Identifiers: 101818
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf3.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons