Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24908
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSalvia, G-
dc.contributor.authorPluchinotta, I-
dc.contributor.authorTsoulou, I-
dc.contributor.authorMoore, G-
dc.contributor.authorZimmermann, N-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-14T15:18:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-14T15:18:16Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-23-
dc.identifier2575-
dc.identifier.citationSalvia, G., Pluchinotta, I., Tsoulou, I., Moore, G. and Zimmermann, N. (2022) 'Understanding Urban Green Space Usage through Systems Thinking: A Case Study in Thamesmead, London', Sustainability, 14 (5), 2575, pp. 1 - 24. doi: 10.3390/su14052575.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24908-
dc.description.abstractCopyright: © 2022 by the authors.Urban green spaces provide environmental, economic, societal and health benefits to cities. However, policy and planning interventions aiming to improve usage have often led to unintended consequences, including, in some circumstances, an actual decline in usage. Previous research has identified factors influencing the use of urban green space, more often with a focus on the ‘quality’ and physical features of the space, rather than on the broader social factors. This study aims to unpack the complexity of factors that influence the use of urban green space through the application of Systems Thinking. A qualitative mixed-method approach integrating System Dynamics with rapid ethnography was adopted to elicit the views of local residents in Thamesmead, London. A thematic analysis of interviews was undertaken to systematically map the causal relations between factors, which were compared to wider stakeholders’ views. Our findings highlight the relevance of dynamics and social influences on the use of green space, which include social interactions and stewardship, health conditions, availability of services and amenities. These are factors that are underexplored in the literature and, sometimes, overlooked in urban green space policy by decision-makers. We infer that attendance of urban green spaces requires time, which may be occupied in other practices determined by local conditions and needs. Expanding the spatial and temporal boundaries of investigation, wider than debates on ‘quality’, should, in our view, increase the chances of identifying critical influences and foster an increased use of green space.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trust (CUSSH project, ref. no. 209387/Z/17/Z); U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (CAMELLIA project, ref. no. NE/S003495/1).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 24-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjecturban green spaceen_US
dc.subjectsystem dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectsystems thinkingen_US
dc.subjectunintended consequencesen_US
dc.subjectcausal loop diagramen_US
dc.subjectrapid ethnographyen_US
dc.subjectleisure timeen_US
dc.subjectsocial practicesen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding Urban Green Space Usage through Systems Thinking: A Case Study in Thamesmead, Londonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su14052575-
dc.relation.isPartOfSustainability-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume14-
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050-
dc.rights.holderThe authors-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Design School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf3.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons