Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24876
Title: Towards reliable uncertainty quantification for hydrologic predictions, Part II: Characterizing impacts of uncertain factors through an iterative factorial data assimilation framework
Authors: Fan, YR
Shi, X
Duan, QY
Yu, L
Keywords: hydrological prediction;sequential data assimilation;uncertainty factor;factorial design
Issue Date: 9-Jul-2022
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Fan, Y.R. et al. (2022) 'Towards reliable uncertainty quantification for hydrologic predictions, Part II: Characterizing impacts of uncertain factors through an iterative factorial data assimilation framework', Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128136 , pp. 1 - 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128136.
Abstract: Copyright © 2022 The Authors. In this study, an iterative factorial data assimilation (IFDA) framework is developed to holistically characterize the individual and interactive effects of various uncertain factors on hydrological predictions. The IFDA framework is flexible and is able to reveal the impacts from different numbers of uncertain factors. An iterative factorial analysis (IFA) approach is proposed in IFDA to diminish the biased variance estimation in traditional multilevel factorial designs and provide more reliable impact characterization for the considered factors. The proposed IFDA framework is applied to quantitatively reveal the individual and interactive effects of hydrological models, data assimilation (DA) methods, and uncertainties in inputs, streamflow observations and sample sizes on the deterministic and probabilistic predictions from data assimilation. The results indicate that the hydrological models, DA methods and their interactions would have the most dominant effects on hydrological predictions. This implies that different hydrological models or DA methods would produce significantly distinguishable results. When the hydrological model and DA method have been specified, uncertainties in streamflow observations would more likely have a visible effect on the accuracy of resulting predictions. Moreover, the inherent randomness, mainly caused by the Monte Carlo sampling procedures in data assimilation, would also have noticeable effects on the DA performances, especially when the hydrological model and DA method have been pre-identified. These results suggest that enhancement of hydrological models and data assimilation methods would be the most efficient pathway to generate reliable hydrological predictions.
Description: Data Availability: Daily precipitation and streamflow data for the River Ouse can be accessed from the National River Flow Archive (NRFA) (https://nrfa.ceh.ac.uk/). The potential evapotranspiration can be obtained from NERC Environmental Information Data Centre, deposited by Tanguy et al. (2017) (https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/documents/17b9c4f7-1c30-4b6f-b2fe-f7780159939c). The IFDA framework are coded in R and can be available from the authors upon request (yurui.fan@brunel.ac.uk).
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24876
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128136
ISSN: 0022-1694
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Yurui Fan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0532-4026
128136
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).4.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons