Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24808
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFan, YR-
dc.contributor.authorShi, X-
dc.contributor.authorDuan, QY-
dc.contributor.authorYu, L-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T12:12:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-06T12:12:55Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-29-
dc.identifier128163-
dc.identifier.citationFan, Y.R., Shi, X., Duan, Q.Y. and Yu, L. (2022) 'Towards reliable uncertainty quantification for hydrologic predictions, Part I: Development of a particle copula Metropolis Hastings method', Journal of Hydrology, 0 (accepted, in press), 128163, pp. 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128163.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-1694-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24808-
dc.descriptionData Availability: Daily precipitation and streamflow data for the River Ouse can be accessed from the National River Flow Archive (NRFA) (https://nrfa.ceh.ac.uk/). The potential evapotranspiration can be obtained from NERC Environmental Information Data Centre, deposited by Tanguy et al. (2017) (https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/documents/17b9c4f7-1c30-4b6f-b2fe-f7780159939c). The PCMH method is coded in R and can be available from the authors upon request (yurui.fan@brunel.ac.uk).en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). In this study, a particle copula Metropolis-Hastings (PCMH) approach was developed for reliable uncertainty quantification of hydrological predictions. The proposed PCMH approach employs a mixed particle evolution scheme, which integrates the Gaussian perturbation and copula-based dependent sampling methods. The Metropolis ratio is then employed to determine the acceptance of the candidate samples. The applicability of PCMH is elaborated for a long-term data assimilation case at the River Ouse in UK. Multiple hydrological models and different uncertainty settings in inputs, outputs and sample sizes are tested by the PCMH, particle filter (PF) and particle Markov chain Monte Carlo (PMCMC) approaches. The results indicate that the developed PCMH approach is able to generate more reliable results with less accuracy fluctuation than PF and PMCMC for both deterministic and probabilistic predictions from all the hydrological models. The mean values and the associated variation intervals of NSE over the total 270 runs for PCMH, PF and PMCMC are 0.752 (variation interval of [0.534, 0.866]), 0.661 (variation interval of [0.080, 0.879]), and 0.655 (variation interval of [0.247, 0.824]), respectively. For the probabilistic predictions evaluated by CRPS, the mean values and fluctuation ranges from PCMH, PF and PMCMC are respectively 15.215 ([8.624,31.549]), 18.758 ([8.595, 43.536]), 19.308 ([10.848, 37.799]). These results suggested that the proposed PCMH method would be more robust than PF and PMCMC in generating reliable hydrologic predictions and be less influenced by the hydrologic model structures, uncertainty scenarios, and its inherent randomness. Moreover, the PCMH method can also show better robustness than the copula-based particle filter method since the particle evolution scheme of PCMH would balance extreme samples from copula sampling procedure by mixing samples from Gaussian perturbation and remove unacceptable candidates through the Metropolis acceptance criterion.-
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Society International Exchanges Program (No. IES\R2\202075).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 16-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjecthydrological predictionsen_US
dc.subjectsequential data assimilationen_US
dc.subjectparticle filteren_US
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectcopulaen_US
dc.titleTowards reliable uncertainty quantification for hydrologic predictions, Part I: Development of a particle copula Metropolis Hastings methoden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128163-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Hydrology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2707-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf5.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons