Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24749
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLomas, DWB-
dc.contributor.authorWard, S-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T16:16:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-29T16:16:02Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-29-
dc.identifier.citationWard, S. and Lomas, D.W.B. (2022) 'Public Perceptions of UK Intelligence: Still In The Dark?', The RUSI Journal, 167 (2), pp. 10-22. doi: 10.1080/03071847.2022.2090426.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0307-1847-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24749-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). Opinion polling of public attitudes on the UK’s intelligence agencies reveals that Britons are often still ambivalent around issues of agency activity and powers despite increasing engagement and outreach activity. Drawing parallels with similar polling in North America and Europe, this article suggests that while public support for national agencies remains relatively strong, with high levels of ‘trust’, views on what intelligence agencies do – and who ‘does intelligence’ – remain deeply wedded to James Bond-like clichés. Daniel W B Lomas and Stephen Ward argue that, while popular perceptions of intelligence have traditionally offered cover and even increased awareness of agencies such as the Secret Intelligence Service, the lack of public awareness is dangerous as agencies build a ‘licence to operate’ in the 21st century.-
dc.format.extent10 - 22 (13)-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge (Taylor & Francis Group)en_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.titlePublic Perceptions of UK Intelligence: Still In The Dark?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2022.2090426-
dc.relation.isPartOfThe RUSI Journal-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume167-
dc.identifier.eissn1744-0378-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.1.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons