Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24062
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGikay, AA-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-05T19:47:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-05T19:47:21Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-28-
dc.identifier.citationGikay, A.A. (2017) 'Rethinking Ethiopian Secured Transactions Law through comparative perspective: lessons from the Uniform Commercial Code of the US', Mizan Law Review, 11 (1), pp. 153 - 195. doi: 10.4314/mlr.v11i1.6.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1998-9881-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24062-
dc.description.abstractCopyright 2017 The Author. Various countries have reformed their secured transaction laws recognizing the significance of modern secured transactions law in enhancing access to credit and economic development. Ethiopia has not undertaken comprehensive secured transactions law reform, despite the demonstrable mismatch between the legal regime governing security interests and the country’s current political, economic and commercial realities. In-depth analysis of the Ethiopian secured transactions law is made in this article in the light of UCC1 Art 9, English, and French secured transactions laws and the EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development) Model law and the experience of civil law jurisdiction of Louisiana. I argue that secured transaction law reform in Ethiopia can be implemented based on UCC Art. 9 with some adjustment in light of Louisiana’s experience. The article uses the unitary concept of security interest and floating lien to exemplify the supremacy of the approaches and policies of UCC Art. 9 and its suitability as a model for potential secured transactions law reform in Ethiopiaen_US
dc.format.extent153 - 195-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSt. Mary's University Center for Law in Sustainable Developmenten_US
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectcredit marketen_US
dc.subjectUCCen_US
dc.subjectunitary concept/theoryen_US
dc.subjectfunctional approachen_US
dc.subjectfloating lienen_US
dc.subjectfloating chargeen_US
dc.subjectsecurity interesten_US
dc.subjectself-help repossessionen_US
dc.subjectefficiencyen_US
dc.titleRethinking Ethiopian Secured Transactions Law through comparative perspective: lessons from the Uniform Commercial Code of the USen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v11i1.6-
dc.relation.isPartOfMizan Law Review-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume11-
dc.identifier.eissn2309-902X-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)355.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons