Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23851
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNika, CE-
dc.contributor.authorExpósito, A-
dc.contributor.authorKisser, J-
dc.contributor.authorBertino, G-
dc.contributor.authorOral, HV-
dc.contributor.authorDehghanian, K-
dc.contributor.authorVasilaki, V-
dc.contributor.authorIacovidou, E-
dc.contributor.authorFatone, F-
dc.contributor.authorAtanasova, N-
dc.contributor.authorKatsou, E-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-30T22:41:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-30T22:41:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-12-
dc.identifier2198-
dc.identifier.citationNika, C.-E., Expósito, A., Kisser, J., Bertino, G., Oral, H.V., Dehghanian, K., Vasilaki, V., Iacovidou, E., Fatone, F., Atanasova, N. and Katsou, E. (2021) ‘Validating Circular Performance Indicators: The Interface between Circular Economy and Stakeholders’, Water, 13 (16), 2198, pp. 1-22. doi: 10.3390/w13162198/en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23851-
dc.description.abstractCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. The development and application of appropriate Circular Economy indicators is an issue that concerns both the scientific and the business community, as well as decision makers. The existing gap between research, policy and practice could be bridged by using a dynamic indicators selection approach that combines both expert and participatory practices. This study aims to develop such a novel approach for the selection of indicators based on views and needs of practitioners, whilst considering the complex interdependencies of the indicators and determining their importance. Twenty circularity indicators for the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems nexus are selected and ranked by different stakeholders. The interrelationships of the indicators are identified using the Interpretive Structural Model, resulting in six levels of importance. Cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) analysis further enabled the classification of the twenty indicators into four categories based on their driving and dependence power. The results indicate that seven indicators— one related to regeneration of natural environment principle, four related to keep resources in use, and two related to design out negative externalities—are the driving indicators to Circular Economy. The approach can be applied to other sets of indicators as well, enabling their prioritization and implementation with other systems.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCOST Action CA17133 Circular City; Horizon 2020 innovation projects HYDROUSA (grant agreement no. 776643) and HOUSEFUL (grantagreement no. 776708).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 22-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectcircular economy indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectparticipatory approachen_US
dc.subjectinterpretive structural modelen_US
dc.subjectwater-energy-food-ecosystems nexusen_US
dc.titleValidating circular performance indicators: The interface between circular economy and stakeholdersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/w13162198-
dc.relation.isPartOfWater (Switzerland)-
pubs.issue16-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume13-
dc.identifier.eissn2073-4441-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons