Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23829
Title: Secondary data analyses of conclusions drawn by the program implementers of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong
Authors: Siu, AMH
Shek, DTL
Keywords: subjective outcome evaluation;positive youth development;secondary data analysis
Issue Date: 12-Feb-2010
Publisher: TheScientificWorld
Citation: Siu, A.M.H. and Shek, D.T.L. (2010) 'Secondary data analyses of conclusions drawn by the program implementers of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong', TheScientificWorldJournal, 10, 726125, pp. 238 - 249. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2010.1.
Abstract: Copyright © 2010 with author(s). The Tier 2 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Pcombining macron belowositive Acombining macron belowdolescent Tcombining macron belowraining through Hcombining macron belowolistic Scombining macron belowocial Programmes) is designed for adolescents with significant psychosocial needs, and its various programs are designed and implemented by social workers (program implementers) for specific student groups in different schools. Using subjective outcome evaluation data collected from the program participants (Form C) at 207 schools, the program implementers were asked to aggregate data and write down five conclusions (n = 1,035) in their evaluation reports. The conclusions stated in the evaluation reports were further analyzed via secondary data analyses in this study. Results showed that the participants regarded the Tier 2 Program as a success, and was effective in enhancing self-understanding, interpersonal skills, and self-management. They liked the experiential learning approach and activities that are novel, interesting, diversified, adventure-based, and outdoor in nature. They also liked instructors who were friendly, supportive, well-prepared, and able to bring challenges and give positive recognition. Most of the difficulties encountered in running the programs were related to time constraints, clashes with other activities, and motivation of participants. Consistent with the previous evaluation findings, the present study suggests that the Tier 2 Program was well received by the participants and that it was beneficial to the development of the program participants. ©2010 with author.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23829
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2010.1
ISSN: 2356-6140
Other Identifiers: 726125
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf623.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons