Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23804
Title: Specialised IP Judiciary: What Are the Key Elements to Consider when Establishing or Reforming an Effective IP Court?
Authors: Gurgula, O
Padamczyk, M
Shemtov, N
Keywords: IP disputes;specialised IP courts;IP adjudication;IP litigation;intellectual property
Issue Date: 30-Dec-2021
Publisher: Oxford University Press on behalf of German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property and Copyright e.V.
Citation: Gurgula, O., Padamczyk, M. and Shemtov, N. (2021) 'Specialised IP Judiciary: What Are the Key Elements to Consider when Establishing or Reforming an Effective IP Court?', GRUR International - Journal of European and International IP Law, 71 (3), pp. 206 - 212. doi: 10.1093/grurint/ikab172.
Abstract: Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Intellectual property (‘IP’) is one of the key instruments for fostering innovation and promoting the growth of national economies. Given both the economic significance and the legal complexities associated with IP rights due to constant technological development, the benefits of having a specialised IP judiciary are being increasingly recognised across the globe. Many countries have either established or have been considering the introduction of various forms of such a specialised judiciary. This paper examines this trend and explores some key considerations in relation to the efficacy of an IP judiciary. It draws on some of the findings of a recently completed project funded by the UK government on the creation and functioning of a new IP court in Ukraine. While there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ model when creating a specialised IP judiciary, the discussion in this article sheds light on a number of key factors that should be taken into account and carefully assessed when establishing or reforming such a judiciary. This includes specific considerations related to the structure of an IP judiciary, its location, the specialisation of IP judges, exclusive jurisdiction and other procedural issues. We believe that the guidance provided in this article will assist policymakers in their choices regarding the most suitable design of an IP judiciary for a particular jurisdiction, leading to the enhancement of its operation for the benefit of all the stakeholders in the IP enforcement system.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23804
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikab172
ISSN: 2632-8623
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Olga Gurgula https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-9804
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by OUP and CH Beck on behalf of GRUR e.V. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.170.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons