Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23426
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, AV-
dc.contributor.authorRego, A-
dc.contributor.authorBerti, M-
dc.contributor.authorClegg, S-
dc.contributor.authorCunha, MPe-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-31T14:25:47Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-31T14:25:47Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-18-
dc.identifier.citationSimpson, A.V., Rego, A., Berti, M., Clegg, S. and Cunha, M.P. (2021) 'Theorizing compassionate leadership from the case of Jacinda Ardern: Legitimacy, paradox and resource conservation', Leadership, 18 (3), pp. 337 - 358 (22). doi: 10.1177/17427150211055291.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1742-7150-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23426-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. During times of suffering such as that inflicted by the COVID-19 pandemic, compassion expressed by leaders helps to ease distress. Doing so, those in a position to provide resources that might facilitate coping and recovery are attentive to the situations of distress. Despite an abundance of leadership theorizing and models, there still is little academic literature on compassionate leadership. To address this limitation, we present an exploratory case study of New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, someone widely recognized for her compassionate leadership and frequently described in paradoxical terms (e.g. ‘kind and strong’; embodying ‘steel and compassion’). We address her compassionate leadership through the lenses of paradox theory, legitimacy theory and conservation of resources theory. We contribute a heuristic framework that sees various types of legitimacy leveraged synergistically to build resources and alleviate suffering – providing further legitimacy in an upward spiral of compassionate leadership.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2019, UIDB/00124/2020 and Social Sciences DataLab, PINFRA/22209/2016); POR Lisboa and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, PINFRA/22209/2016); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/GES/00731/2019, UID/GES/00315/2019).-
dc.format.extent337 - 358 (22)-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectcompassionen_US
dc.subjectleadershipen_US
dc.subjectparadoxen_US
dc.subjectlegitimacyen_US
dc.subjectJacinda Ardernen_US
dc.titleTheorizing compassionate leadership from the case of Jacinda Ardern: Legitimacy, paradox and resource conservationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211055291-
dc.relation.isPartOfLeadership-
pubs.issue3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume18-
dc.identifier.eissn1742-7169-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).822.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons