Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22867
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastro, F-
dc.contributor.authorBryjka, PA-
dc.contributor.authorDi Pino, G-
dc.contributor.authorVuckovic, A-
dc.contributor.authorNowicky, A-
dc.contributor.authorBishop, D-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-19T04:48:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-19T04:48:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-16-
dc.identifier105768-
dc.identifier.citationCastro, F., Bryjka, P.A., Di Pino, G., Vuckovic, A., Nowicky, A. and Bishop D. (2021) 'Sonification of combined action observation and motor imagery: Effects on corticospinal excitability', Brain and Cognition, 152, 105768, pp. 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105768.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0278-2626-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22867-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Action observation and motor imagery are valuable strategies for motor learning. Their simultaneous use (AOMI) increases neural activity, with related benefits for motor learning, compared to the two strategies alone. In this study, we explored how sonification influences AOMI. Twenty-five participants completed a practice block based on AOMI, motor imagery and physical execution of the same action. Participants were divided into two groups: An experimental group that practiced with sonification during AOMI (sAOMI), and a control group, which did not receive any extrinsic feedback. Corticospinal excitability at rest and during action observation and AOMI was assessed before and after practice, with and without sonification sound, to test the development of an audiomotor association. The practice block increased corticospinal excitability in all testing conditions, but sonification did not affect this. In addition, we found no differences in action observation and AOMI, irrespective of sonification. These results suggest that, at least for simple tasks, sonification of AOMI does not influence corticospinal excitability; In these conditions, sonification may have acted as a distractor. Future studies should further explore the relationship between task complexity, value of auditory information and action, to establish whether sAOMI is a valuable for motor learning.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBrunel University London Ph.D Studentshipen_US
dc.format.extent1 - 10-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjecttranscranial magnetic stimulationen_US
dc.subjectsensory augmentationen_US
dc.subjectdual simulation hypothesisen_US
dc.subjectmotor imageryen_US
dc.subjectaudiomotor resonanceen_US
dc.titleSonification of Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery: Effects on Corticospinal Excitabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105768-
dc.relation.isPartOfBrain and Cognition-
pubs.issueAugust 2021-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume152-
dc.identifier.eissn1090-2147-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).2.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons