Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22784
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRose, DC-
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, N-
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, BI-
dc.contributor.authorTew, ER-
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, RJ-
dc.contributor.authorVadrot, ABM-
dc.contributor.authorDoubleday, R-
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, WJ-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-29T20:12:40Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-
dc.date.available2021-05-29T20:12:40Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-31-
dc.identifier.citationRose, D.C., Mukherjee, N., Simmons, B.I., Tew, E.R., Robertson, R.J., Vadrot, A.B.M., Doubleday, R. and Sutherland, W.J. (2020) 'Policy windows for the environment: Tips for improving the uptake of scientific knowledge', Environmental Science & Policy, 113, pp. 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.013.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1462-9011-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22784-
dc.description.abstract© 2017 The Authors. Scientific knowledge is considered to be an important factor (alongside others) in environmental policy-making. However, the opportunity for environmentalists to influence policy can often occur within short, discrete time windows. Therefore, a piece of research may have a negligible or transformative policy influence depending on when it is presented. These ‘policy windows’ are sometimes predictable, such as those dealing with conventions or legislation with a defined renewal period, but are often hard to anticipate. We describe four ways that environmentalists can respond to policy windows and increase the likelihood of knowledge uptake: 1) foresee (and create) emergent windows, 2) respond quickly to opening windows, 3) frame research in line with appropriate windows, and 4) persevere in closed windows. These categories are closely linked; efforts to enhance the incorporation of scientific knowledge into policy need to harness mechanisms within each. We illustrate the main points with reference to nature conservation, but the principles apply widely.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union Seventh Framework Programme EU Biodiversity Observation Network (No. 308454); Fondation Wiener Anspach, Belgium; Scriven fellowship; Natural Environment Research Council Cambridge Earth System Science NERC DTP [NE/L002507/1]; Natural Environment Research Council Industrial CASE studentship [NE/M010287/1]; Austrian Science Fund (FWF); Arcadia.en_US
dc.format.extent47 - 54-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectevidence-based conservationen_US
dc.subjectevidence-based policyen_US
dc.subjectevidence-informed policyen_US
dc.subjecthorizon scanningen_US
dc.subjectpolicy windowsen_US
dc.subjectscience-policy interfaceen_US
dc.titlePolicy windows for the environment: Tips for improving the uptake of scientific knowledgeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.013-
dc.relation.isPartOfEnvironmental Science & Policy-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume113-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6416-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf419.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons