Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22771
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKok, M-
dc.contributor.authorKal, E-
dc.contributor.authorvan Doodewaard, C-
dc.contributor.authorSavelsbergh, G-
dc.contributor.authorvan der Kamp, J-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-26T16:22:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-26T16:22:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-28-
dc.identifier102019-
dc.identifier.citationKok, M. et al. (2021) 'Tailoring Explicit and Implicit Instruction Methods to the Verbal Working Memory Capacity of Students with Special Needs Can Benefit Motor Learning Outcomes in Physical Education', Learning and Individual Differences: journal of psychology and education, 89, 102019, pp. 1 - 16. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102019.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1041-6080-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22771-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2021 The Authors. This study examined the effects of explicit versus implicit instructions and feedback methods on motor learning and perceived competence of 9-to 13-year old students with special educational needs practicing a balancing task during physical education. The aim was to test if and how the effects of type of instruction and feedback methods were influenced by students' verbal and visuospatial working memory capacities. The students significantly increased their balancing performance and perceived competence from pre- to posttest, with no differences between groups. The relation between type of instruction and feedback methods and learning outcomes was significantly influenced by verbal working memory capacity, not by visuospatial working memory capacity. Physical education teachers may need to align their instructions with verbal working memory capacity, by providing implicit instructions and feedback methods in students with low verbal working memory capacity and explicit instruction and feedback methods in students with high verbal working memory capacity.-
dc.description.sponsorshipNetherlands Initiative for Education Research (NRO, 40.5.18500.021)..en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 16-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectexplicit instructionen_US
dc.subjectmotor learningen_US
dc.subjectworking memoryen_US
dc.subjectphysical educationen_US
dc.subjectspecial educational needsen_US
dc.titleTailoring Explicit and Implicit Instruction Methods to the Verbal Working Memory Capacity of Students with Special Needs Can Benefit Motor Learning Outcomes in Physical Educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102019-
dc.relation.isPartOfLearning and Individual Differences: journal of psychology and education-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume89-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-3425-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).1.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons