Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22464
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTucker, D-
dc.contributor.authorHendy, J-
dc.contributor.authorChrysanthaki, T-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-17T09:38:29Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-17T09:38:29Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-08-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Danielle A Tucker https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0030-5181-
dc.identifier.citationTucker, D., Hendy, J., and Chrysanthaki, T. (2021) 'How does policy alienation develop? Exploring street-level bureaucrats’ agency in policy context shift in UK telehealthcare', Human Relations, 75 (9), pp. 1679 - 1706 (28). doi: 10.1177/00187267211003633.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0018-7267-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22464-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Policies can fail when frontline staff feel they have limited influence on policy implementation (powerlessness), or that policy has little or no personal meaning (meaninglessness) – they become alienated from the policy. But, how does this alienation develop? In this paper we ask whether policy alienation might be viewed as a process that develops over time: a process that ebbs and flows, interacting with the policy landscape as it shifts, rather than a psychological state. Feelings of alienation can be shared across groups of actors, as they collectively shift and initiate change. This study uses participant observation and interviews with front-line employees as they navigate a UK Government Policy introducing telehealthcare to improve health management of patients with chronic conditions. We find: i) cumulative misalignment between different policy implementation contexts allows policy alienation to develop over time, ii) the shared experience of alienation in co-worker groups contributes to further misalignment, iii) front-line staff use their discretion to respond to policy alienation, which has the power to enhance or destroy policy implementation. We offer an alternative perspective for understanding how policy alienation can be prevented and policy implementation can be enhanced.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUK Government’s ’Preventative Technology Grant’ and ’Whole System Demonstrator’ programme, further underpinned by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), The Health and Care Infrastructure Research and Innovation Centre (HaCIRIC), https://www.reading.ac.uk/icrc/Projects/icrc-projects-11-HaCIRIC.aspx.en_US
dc.format.extent1679 - 1706 (28)-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsRights and permissions: Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectpublic policyen_US
dc.subjectimplementationen_US
dc.subjectalienationen_US
dc.subjecttelehealthen_US
dc.subjecttelecareen_US
dc.subjectstreet-level bureaucratsen_US
dc.subjectqualitativeen_US
dc.titleHow does policy alienation develop? Exploring Street-Level Bureaucrats’ agency in policy context shift in UK telehealthcareen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211003633-
dc.relation.isPartOfHuman Relations-
pubs.issue9-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume75-
dc.identifier.eissn1741-282X-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons