Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22451
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez-Armas, E-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-16T11:37:10Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01-
dc.date.available2021-03-16T11:37:10Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationLa Ley – Unión Europea, 2018, 55en_US
dc.identifier.issn2255-551X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22451-
dc.language.isoesen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.subjectPrivate International Lawen_US
dc.subjectInternational Jurisdictionen_US
dc.subjectDomestic Jurisdictionen_US
dc.subjectSpecial Head of Jurisdiction in Contractual Mattersen_US
dc.subjectInterpretative Coherenceen_US
dc.subjectClose Connectionen_US
dc.titleSentencia Kareda v Benkö: ¿continuidad interpretativa (en materia de competencia judicial internacional respecto a acciones de repetición entre codeudores) o exceso de coherencia jurisprudencial por parte del TJUE?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfLa Ley – Unión Europea-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume55-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf292.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.