Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21658
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLai, CS-
dc.contributor.authorLocatelli, G-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T18:44:54Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-20T18:44:54Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-16-
dc.identifierORCID iDs: Chun Sing Lai https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4169-4438; Giorgio Locatelli https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9986-2249.-
dc.identifier124626-
dc.identifier.citationLai, C.S. and Locatelli, G. (2021) 'Are energy policies for supporting low-carbon power generation killing energy storage?', Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124626, pp. 1 - 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124626en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526-
dc.identifier.other124626-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21658-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2020 The Authors. This paper explores the impacts of energy policies for supporting low-carbon infrastructure on the economic and financial performance of energy storage when coupled with a generator. The study sets in the UK context, and the unit of analysis is the generator connected with energy storage. An analytical method is derived to assess the impact of policy schemes for low-carbon infrastructure on energy storage. The case study of energy storage systems coupled with a Small Modular nuclear Reactor (SMR) is quantitatively investigated in three scenarios: 1. SMR-only (the baseline); 2. SMR with thermal energy storage; and 3. SMR with Lithium-ion battery. For the strike price at 100 £/MWh, the net present value for Cases 2 and 3 reduces by 32% and 400%, respectively, when the energy storage capacity increases from 100 MWh to 1 GWh. As the net present value reduces with increased energy storage capacity (when coupled with generation), this work shows that low-carbon incentives are, unintentionally, barriers to the development of energy storage due to: (A) current generator incentives give a favourable return on investment and energy storage would diminish it; (B) energy storage cannot participate in generator only incentives.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEPSRC grant “GIES: Generation Integrated Energy Storage: A Paradigm Shift” (EP/P022049/1).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 16-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectenergy storageen_US
dc.subjectlow-carbon power incentivesen_US
dc.subjectcontract for differenceen_US
dc.subjectgenerationen_US
dc.subjectintegrated energy storageen_US
dc.titleAre energy policies for supporting low-carbon power generation killing energy storage?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124626-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Cleaner Production-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume280-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).2.88 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons