Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21469
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbdelfattah, T-
dc.contributor.authorElmahgoub, M-
dc.contributor.authorElamer, AA-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T15:01:26Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-20T15:01:26Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-15-
dc.identifier.citationAbdelfattah, T., Elmahgoub, M. and Elamer, A.A. (2021) 'Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence', Journal of Business Ethics, 174, pp. 177 - 197. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04607-0.-
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21469-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. This study investigates whether audit partner gender is associated with the extent of auditor disclosure and the communication style regarding risks of material misstatements that are classified as key audit matters (KAMs). Using a sample of UK firms during the 2013–2017 period, our results suggest that female audit partners are more likely than male audit partners to disclose more KAMs with more details after controlling for both client and audit firm attributes. Furthermore, female audit partners are found to use a less optimistic tone and provide less readable audit reports, compared to their male counterparts, suggesting that behavioural variances between female and male audit partners may have significant implications on their writing style. Therefore, this study offers new insights on the role of audit partner gender in extended audit reporting. Our findings have important implications for audit firms, investors, policymakers and governments in relation to the development, implementation and enforcement of gender diversity.-
dc.format.extent177 - 197-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectauditor genderen_US
dc.subjectkey audit mattersen_US
dc.subjectgender differencesen_US
dc.subjectextended audit reportingen_US
dc.subjecttoneen_US
dc.subjectreadabilityen_US
dc.subjectUKen_US
dc.titleFemale audit partners and extended audit reporting: UK Evidenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04607-0-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Business Ethics-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume174-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0697-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf959.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons