Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21178
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoung, W-
dc.contributor.authorEllmers, T-
dc.contributor.authorKinrade, N-
dc.contributor.authorCossar, J-
dc.contributor.authorCocks, A-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-08T15:31:12Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-08T15:31:12Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-09-
dc.identifier.citationYoung, W.R., Ellmers, T.J., Kinrade, N.P., Cossar, J. and Cocks, A.J. (2020) 'Re-evaluating the measurement and influence of conscious movement processing on gait performance in older adults: Development of the Gait-Specific Attentional Profile', Gait & posture, 81, pp. 73-77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.07.008.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0966-6362-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21178-
dc.description.abstractBackground Recent decades have seen increased interest in how anxiety–and associated changes in conscious movement processing (CMP)–can influence the control of balance and gait, particularly in older adults. However, the most prevalent scale used to measure CMP during gait (the Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale (MSRS)) is generic (i.e., non-gait-specific) and potentially lacks sensitivity in this context. Methods In a preliminary study, we first sought to evaluate if MSRS scores associated with the number of CMP-related thoughts self-reported by older adults while walking. The next aim was to develop and validate a new questionnaire (the Gait-Specific Attentional Profile, G-SAP) capable of measuring gait-specific CMP, in addition to other attentional processes purported to influence gait. This scale was validated using responses from 117 (exploratory) and 107 (confirmatory factor analysis) older adults, resulting in an 11-item scale with four sub-scales: CMP, anxiety, fall-related ruminations, and processing inefficiencies. Finally, in a separate cohort of 53 older adults, we evaluated associations between scores from both the G-SAP CMP subscale and the MSRS, and gait outcomes measured using a GAITRite walkway in addition to participants’ fall-history. Results MSRS scores were not associated with self-reported thoughts categorised as representing CMP. In regression analyses that controlled for functional balance, unlike the MSRS, the G-SAP subscale of CMP significantly predicted several gait characteristics including velocity (p = .033), step length (p = .032), and double-limb support (p = .015). Significance The G-SAP provides gait-specific measures of four psychological factors implicated in mediating the control of balance and gait. In particular, unlike the MSRS, the G-SAP subscale of CMP appears sensitive to relevant attentional processes known to influence gait performance. We suggest that the G-SAP offers an opportunity for the research community to further develop understanding of psychological factors impacting gait performance across a range of applied clinical contexts.-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectanxietyen_US
dc.subjectgaiten_US
dc.subjectfear of fallingen_US
dc.subjectreinvestmenten_US
dc.subjectruminationen_US
dc.titleRe-evaluating the measurement and influence of conscious movement processing on gait performance in older adults: development of the Gait-Specific Attentional Profile.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.07.008-
dc.relation.isPartOfGait and Posture-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed until 09 Jul 2021765.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.