Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20980
Title: Representation of behaviour change interventions and their evaluation: Development of the Upper Level of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology
Authors: Michie, S
West, R
Finnerty, AN
Norris, E
Wright, AJ
Marques, MM
Johnston, M
Kelly, MP
Thomas, J
Hastings, J
Keywords: behaviour;behaviour change;ontologies;interventions;evidence synthesis;evaluation studies
Issue Date: 6-Jan-2021
Publisher: F1000 Research Ltd
Citation: Michie, S, et al. (2021) 'Representation of behaviour change interventions and their evaluation: Development of the Upper Level of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology', [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Research, 2020, 5, 123, pp. 1 - 30. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15902.2.
Abstract: Background: Behaviour change interventions (BCI), their contexts and evaluation methods are heterogeneous, making it difficult to synthesise evidence and make recommendations for real-world policy and practice. Ontologies provide a means for addressing this. They represent knowledge formally as entities and relationships using a common language able to cross disciplinary boundaries and topic domains. This paper reports the development of the upper level of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology (BCIO), which provides a systematic way to characterise BCIs, their contexts and their evaluations. Methods: Development took place in four steps. (1) Entities and relationships were identified by behavioural and social science experts, based on their knowledge of evidence and theory, and their practical experience of behaviour change interventions and evaluations. (2) The outputs of the first step were critically examined by a wider group of experts, including the study ontology expert and those experienced in annotating relevant literature using the initial ontology entities. The outputs of the second step were tested by (3) feedback from three external international experts in ontologies and (4) application of the prototype upper-level BCIO to annotating published reports; this informed the final development of the upper-level BCIO. Results: The final upper-level BCIO specifies 42 entities, including the BCI scenario, elaborated across 21 entities and 7 relationship types, and the BCI evaluation study comprising 10 entities and 9 relationship types. BCI scenario entities include the behaviour change intervention (content and delivery), outcome behaviour, mechanism of action, and its context, which includes population and setting. These entities have corresponding entities relating to the planning and reporting of interventions and their evaluations. Conclusions: The upper level of the BCIO provides a comprehensive and systematic framework for representing BCIs, their contexts and their evaluations.
Description: Data availability: Underlying data The BCIO is available from: https://github.com/HumanBehaviourChangeProject/ontologies.
Archived ontology at time of publication of revised version of the paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4334592 (Norris et al., 2020a). License: CC-BY 4.0.
Extended data: Open Science Framework: Human Behaviour-Change Project. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UXWDB (West et al., 2020). This project contains the following extended data related to this method: HBCP Ontology Methodology Summary (PDF). BCIO Upper Level Expert Feedback (PDF). Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
First Version Published: 10 Jun 2020, 5:123 (https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15902.1); Latest Version Published: 06 Jan 2021, 5:123 (https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15902.2).
This article is included in Human Behaviour-Change Project collection available online at: https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/collections/humanbehaviourchange/about.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20980
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15902.2
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Susan Michie https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-6378
ORCID iD: Robert West https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-0921
ORCID iD: Ailbhe N. Finnerty https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2355-4332
ORCID iD: Emma Norris https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-4025
ORCID iD: Alison J. Wright https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-5219
ORCID iD: Marta M. Marques https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-9557
ORCID iD: Marie Johnston https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-4827
ORCID iD: Michael P. Kelly https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-5841
ORCID iD: James Thomas https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-4190
ORCID iD: Janna Hastings https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-4923
123
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright: © 2021 Michie S et al. This is an open access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons