Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20476
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChelley-Steeley, PL-
dc.contributor.authorLambertides, N-
dc.contributor.authorSteeley, JM-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-11T11:10:39Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-01-
dc.date.available2020-03-11T11:10:39Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Empirical Finance, 2015, 34 pp. 204 - 228en_US
dc.identifier.issn0927-5398-
dc.identifier.issnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2015.05.004-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20476-
dc.description.abstractUsing a simulation analysis we show that non-trading can cause an overstatement of the observed illiquidity ratio. Our paper shows how this overstatement can be eliminated with a very simple adjustment to the Amihud illiquidity ratio. We find that the adjustment improves the relationship between the illiquidity ratio and measures of illiquidity calculated from transaction data. Asset pricing tests show that without the adjustment, illiquidity premia estimates can be understated by more than 17% for NYSE securities and by more than 24% for NASDAQ securities.en_US
dc.format.extent204 - 228-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectIlliquidity ratioen_US
dc.subjectNon-tradingen_US
dc.subjectAsset pricingen_US
dc.titleThe effects of non-trading on the illiquidity ratioen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2015.05.004-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Empirical Finance-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume34-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf665.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.