Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/19876
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMold, F-
dc.contributor.authorHendy, J-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Y-L-
dc.contributor.authorde Lusignan, S-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-18T13:50:01Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-03-
dc.date.available2019-12-18T13:50:01Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-03-
dc.identifier.citationJMIR Medical Informatics, 2019, 7 (4), pp. 1 - 14 (14)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2291-9694-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/19876-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Governments and health care providers are keen to find innovative ways to deliver care more efficiently. Interest in electronic consultation (e-consultation) has grown, but the evidence of benefit is uncertain. Objective: This study aimed to assess the evidence of delivering e-consultation using secure email and messaging or video links in primary care. Methods: A systematic review was conducted on the use and application of e-consultations in primary care. We searched 7 international databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, EconLit, and Web of Science; 1999-2017), identifying 52 relevant studies. Papers were screened against a detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Independent dual data extraction was conducted and assessed for quality. The resulting evidence was synthesized using thematic analysis. Results: This review included 57 studies from a range of countries, mainly the United States (n=30) and the United Kingdom (n=13). There were disparities in uptake and utilization toward more use by younger, employed adults. Patient responses to e-consultation were mixed. Patients reported satisfaction with services and improved self-care, communication, and engagement with clinicians. Evidence for the acceptability and ease of use was strong, especially for those with long-term conditions and patients located in remote regions. However, patients were concerned about the privacy and security of their data. For primary health care staff, e-consultation delivers challenges around time management, having the correct technological infrastructure, whether it offers a comparable standard of clinical quality, and whether it improves health outcomes. Conclusions: E-consultations may improve aspects of care delivery, but the small scale of many of the studies and low adoption rates leave unanswered questions about usage, quality, cost, and sustainability. We need to improve e-consultation implementation, demonstrate how e-consultations will not increase disparities in access, provide better reassurance to patients about privacy, and incorporate e-consultation as part of a manageable clinical workflow.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 14 (14)-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJMIR Publicationsen_US
dc.subjectReferral and consultationen_US
dc.subjectHealth services accessibilityen_US
dc.subjectPrimary health careen_US
dc.subjectGeneral practiceen_US
dc.subjectPatient access to recordsen_US
dc.subjectPatient portalsen_US
dc.subjectWeb-based accessen_US
dc.titleElectronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13042-
dc.relation.isPartOfJMIR Medical Informatics-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume7-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf250.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.