Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/18766
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOzbilgin, MF-
dc.contributor.authorYalkin, C-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-18T11:22:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-18T11:22:55Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-01-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Mustafa Özbilgin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-9534-
dc.identifier.citationOzbilgin, M. F. and Yalkin, C. (2019) 'Hegemonic dividend and workforce diversity: The case of ‘biat’ and meritocracy in nation branding in Turkey', Journal of Management and Organization, 25 (4), pp. 543 - 553. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2019.39.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1833-3672-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/18766-
dc.description.abstractWe introduce and explore the notion of hegemonic dividend in the context of a country which does not have hierarchy attenuating means such as legal measures to protect workforce diversity. This paper explains the consequences of two hierarchy enhancing ideologies on workforce diversity in Turkey; meritocracy, an ideology that privileges merit, and ‘biat’, an ideology of subservience to the structures of power. We illustrate how these two ideologies operate as a duality, as meritocracy vanes with dire circumstances for workforce diversity in nation-branding efforts of Turkey. Drawing on Bourdieu and Gramsci, we illustrate hegemonic dividend in the increasingly hegemonic system in which journalism, as a state apparatus, is embedded in Turkey, where privileged few are sustaining and advancing their positions of power by appealing to and submitting themselves to the revisioned nation brand. We focus on the news industry as it commands a special position of power in terms of creating, modifying and controlling the discourses of a nation brand. We argue that failing to protect and promote workforce diversity with hierarchy attenuating measures exposes nation branding practices to discriminatory and hierarchy enhancing ideologies that negate efforts to achieve humanisation and democratisation of work.-
dc.format.extent543 - 553-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Managementen_US
dc.rightsThis material has been published in Journal of Management and Organization by Ozbilgin, M.F. and Yalkin, C., available at https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.39. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.titleHegemonic dividend and workforce diversity: The case of 'biat' and meritocracy in nation branding in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.39-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Management and Organization-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume25-
dc.identifier.eissn1839-3527-
dc.rights.holderCambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfThis material has been published in Journal of Management and Organization by Ozbilgin, M.F. and Yalkin, C., available at https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.39. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019167.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons