Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1841
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStanton, NA-
dc.coverage.spatial5en
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-14T13:45:48Z-
dc.date.available2008-03-14T13:45:48Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 13(2): 107-111en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1841-
dc.description.abstractComputers are ubiquitous, in terms that they are everywhere, but does this mean the same as ubiquitous computing? Views are divided. The convergent device (one-does-all) view posits the computer as a tool through which anything, and indeed everything, can be done (Licklider & Taylor, 1968). The divergent device (many-do-all) view, by contrast, offers a world where microprocessors are embedded in everything and communicating with one another (Weiser, 1991). This debate is implicitly present in this issue, with examples of the convergent device in Crook & Barrowcliff's paper and in Gay et al's paper, and examples of the divergent devices in Thomas & Gellersen's paper and Baber's paper. I suspect both streams of technology are likely to co-exist.en
dc.format.extent60812 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLawrence Erlbaum Associatesen
dc.titleUbiquitous computing: Anytime, anyplace, anywhere?en
dc.typeResearch Paperen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1302_1-
Appears in Collections:Ergonomics
Brunel Design School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ubiquitous_computing_Stanton(postprint).pdf59.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.