Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17964
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, C-
dc.contributor.authorNelis, SM-
dc.contributor.authorMartyr, A-
dc.contributor.authorVictor, C-
dc.contributor.authorMorris, RG-
dc.contributor.authorClare, L-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-29T16:06:25Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-11-
dc.date.available2019-04-29T16:06:25Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2019, pp. ? - ? (11)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1064-7481-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17964-
dc.description.abstractObjective The aim of this study was to identify the potential impact of positive and negative dimensions of caregiving on caregiver well-being and satisfaction with life (SwL). Methods This study used time-point one data from the Improving the experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life (also known as IDEAL)cohort study that involved 1,283 informal caregivers of people in the mild-to-moderate stages of dementia recruited from 29 sites within Great Britain. Multivariate linear regression modeling was used to investigate the associations between positive dimensions of caregiving (measured by caregiving competence and perceptions of positive aspects of caregiving), negative dimensions of caregiving (measured by caregiving stress and role captivity), and caregiver well-being and SwL. Results Lower well-being was associated with low caregiving competence (–13.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]:–16.67, –10.87), perceiving fewer positive aspects of caregiving (–7.67; 95% CI:–10.26, –5.07), high caregiving stress (–24.45; 95% CI:–26.94, –21.96), and high role captivity (–15.61; 95% CI:–18.33, –12.89). Lower SwL was associated with low caregiving competence (–4.61; 95% CI:–5.57, –3.66), perceiving fewer positive aspects of caregiving (–3.09; 95% CI:–3.94, –2.25), high caregiving stress (–7.88; 95% CI:–8.71, –7.06), and high role captivity (–6.41; 95% CI:–7.27, –5.54). When these four measures were combined within the same model, only positive aspects of caregiving and caregiving stress retained independent associations with well-being and SwL. Conclusion Both positive and negative dimensions of caregiving were associated with caregiver well-being and SwL. Psychological therapies and interventions need to consider not only the negative aspects of caregiving but also positive caregiving experiences and their implications for caregiver well-being and SwL.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe IDEAL study is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (United Kingdom) and the National Institute for Health Research (United Kingdom) through grant ES/L001853/2 “Improving the experience of dementia and enhancing active life: living well with dementia” (Investigators: L. Clare, I.R. Jones, C. Victor, J.V. Hindle, R.W. Jones, M. Knapp, M.D. Kopelman, R. Litherland, A. Martyr, F. Matthews, R.G. Morris, S.M. Nelis, J. Pickett, C. Quinn, J. Rusted, and J. Thom). The support of the Economic and Social Research Council and National Institute for Health Research is gratefully acknowledged.en_US
dc.format.extent? - ? (11)-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectcompetenceen_US
dc.subjectgainsen_US
dc.subjectstressen_US
dc.subjectrole-captivityen_US
dc.subjectpositive aspects of caregivingen_US
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_US
dc.titleInfluence of Positive and Negative Dimensions of Dementia Caregiving on Caregiver Well-Being and Satisfaction With Life: Findings From the IDEAL Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2019.02.005-
dc.relation.isPartOfAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf411.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.