Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17214
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHezarkhani, B-
dc.contributor.authorSosic, G-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-12T15:15:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-29-
dc.date.available2018-12-12T15:15:12Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationProduction and Operations Management, 2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-1478-
dc.identifier.issn1937-5956-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17214-
dc.description.abstractWe study mechanisms to manage group purchasing among a set of buyers of a given product with a concave purchase cost function. The buyers are cost‐sensitive and willing to buy a range of product quantities at different prices. We investigate two types of mechanisms that can be used by a group purchasing organization (GPO): (a) ordering mechanisms where the buyers, without divulging private information, choose their order quantities and pay for them according to a given cost‐sharing rule or a fixed price; and (b) bidding mechanisms where the buyers announce their valuations for different quantities and the GPO determines their purchase quantities and cost‐shares according to pre‐announced schemes. Under the choice of appropriate cost‐sharing rules, we introduce a sequential joint ordering mechanism and a family of ordering strategies under which some buyers’ strategic deviations never worsen other buyers. We propose a class of bidding mechanisms with some desirable properties and show that a Nash equilibrium bid schedule always exists wherein all buyers’ profits are at least as high as those under truthful bidding. In our proposed mechanisms, some buyers’ strategic deviation from truthful bidding can only make the others better off. Thus, buyers need not worry about strategic behavior of their counterparts. We compare the performances of the system under different mechanisms and show the superiority of our proposed bidding mechanism. We show that the profits generated by our proposed bidding mechanisms under the proportional cost‐sharing rule are never dominated by the maximum profits of the first‐best fixed price.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectSupply chain managementen_US
dc.subjectGroup purchasingen_US
dc.subjectCost sharingen_US
dc.subjectGame theoryen_US
dc.subjectMechanism designen_US
dc.titleWho's Afraid of Strategic Behavior? Mechanisms for Group Purchasingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.12968-
dc.relation.isPartOfProduction and Operations Management-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf346.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.