Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1682
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStanton, NA-
dc.contributor.authorPinto, M-
dc.coverage.spatial11en
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-21T14:04:15Z-
dc.date.available2008-02-21T14:04:15Z-
dc.date.issued2000-
dc.identifier.citationErgonomics 43: 1359-1370en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1682-
dc.description.abstractTechnological progress is suggesting dramatic changes to the tasks of the driver, with the general aim of making driving environment safer. Before any of these technologies are implemented, empirical research is required to establish if these devices do, in fact, bring about the anticipated improvements. Initially, at least, simulated driving environments offer a means of conducting this research. The study reported here concentrates on the application of a vision enhancement (VE) system within the risk homeostasis paradigm. It was anticipated, in line with risk homeostasis theory, that drivers would compensate for the reduction in risk by increasing speed. The results support the hypothesis although, after a simulated failure of the VE system, drivers did reduce their speed due to reduced confidence in the reliability of the system.en
dc.format.extent176335 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.subjectVisionen
dc.subjectEnhancementen
dc.subjectDrivingen
dc.subjectRhten
dc.subjectSimulationen
dc.titleBehavioural compensation by drivers of a simulator when using a vision enhancement systemen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/001401300421806-
Appears in Collections:Ergonomics
Brunel Design School Research Papers



Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.