Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16524
Title: The Transposition of the Antitrust Damages Directive in the Small Member States of the EU—A Comparative Perspective
Authors: Malinauskaite, J
Cauffman, C
Issue Date: 21-Jul-2018
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Citation: Malinauskaite, M. and Cauffman, C. (2018) 'The Transposition of the Antitrust Damages Directive in the Small Member States of the EU—A Comparative Perspective', Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9 (8), pp. 496 - 512. doi: 10.1093/jeclap/lpy048.
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. The selected EU Member States (i.e. Belgium, Latvia, Lithuania, and Luxembourg) have faced technical and linguistic intricacies in their attempts to align the Antitrust Damages Directive’s provisions with national rules. It seems that the copying/literal method combined with the minimalistic approach dominated in this transposition process, especially in newer small Member States. In the context of the elaboration and gold-plating methods, the paper also discovered some deviations or uncertainties which require to be settled in the future.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16524
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpy048.
ISSN: 2041-7764
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf279.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons