Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15961
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | de Barra, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Eriksson, K | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-12T15:42:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-22 | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-12T15:42:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01-22 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Strimling, P., de Barra, M. & Eriksson, K. Asymmetries in punishment propensity may drive the civilizing process. Nat Hum Behav 2, 148–155 (2018). | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2397-3374 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15961 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Norms about hygiene and violence have both shown a tendency to become increasingly strict, in the sense that the handling of bodily fluids and the use of violence have become increasingly restricted. The generality of this directional change across a large number of societies has not been captured by previous explanations. We propose an explanation of the directional change that is based on the aggregation of everyday interactions. This theory posits that directional norm change can come about if there is an asymmetry in punishment propensity between the people who prefer stricter norms and those who prefer looser norms. Asymmetry in punishment can arise from underlying asymmetry in the threat perceived, where a stricter-than-preferred behaviour is perceived as inherently less threatening than a looser one. We demonstrate the logic of the theory using a formal model and test some of its assumptions through survey experiments. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation grant 2016.0167 and 2015.0005; Professor Roy Weir Career Development Fellowship. | - |
dc.format.extent | 148 - 155 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | - |
dc.subject | history | - |
dc.subject | human behaviour | - |
dc.subject | sociology | - |
dc.title | Asymmetries in punishment propensity may drive the civilizing process | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0278-z | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Nature Human Behaviour | - |
pubs.issue | 2 | - |
pubs.notes | Norms about hygiene and violence have both shown a tendency to become increasingly strict, in the sense that the handling of bodily fluids and the use of violence have become increasingly restricted. The generality of this directional change across a large number of societies has not been captured by previous explanations. We propose an explanation of the directional change that is based on the aggregation of everyday interactions. This theory posits that directional norm change can come about if there is an asymmetry in punishment propensity between the people who prefer stricter norms and those who prefer looser norms. Asymmetry in punishment can arise from underlying asymmetry in the threat perceived, where a stricter-than-preferred behaviour is perceived as inherently less threatening than a looser one. We demonstrate the logic of the theory using a formal model and test some of its assumptions through survey experiments. | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
pubs.volume | 2 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fulltext.pdf | 738.69 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.