Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15737
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAl-Raweshidy, H-
dc.contributor.advisorOwens, T-
dc.contributor.authorEl-Geder, Suad-
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-29T09:48:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-29T09:48:53Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15737-
dc.descriptionThis thesis was submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy and was awarded by Brunel University Londonen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, a scheme of using multiple controllers which handle multiple network devices has been proposed, while using OpenFlow controllers in the proactive operations paradigm, and this in order to face the problem of using a single controller in the SDN model, including the lack of reliability and scalability on such a model. The main characteristic of this new approach are focused on the ability to design a dynamic and highly programmable network, moving the intelligence from the underlying systems to the network itself through a controller. To evaluate the proper effects of this new approach, different dynamic and programmable networks that could simulate real scenarios and measure their performance contrasting the obtained results with the pragmatic theory has been implemented. The SDN (Software-Defined Network) controller (Open Daylight), has been utilized, and thoroughly examined. Different sort of nets has been worked out through diverse Open Daylight functionalities, either implementing the intelligence of the controller (bundle), or going through it by an outside intelligent application (External Orchestrator), and eventually sending it through Open Daylight (by making Open Daylight work as an interpreter/translator from its language to OpenFlow or another protocol language). Summing up, the scheme that has been proposed in this research which is the multiple-proactive mode approach and the single proactive controller has scored no packet loss at all, in which implies the strength of reliability of this scheme, while the multiple reactive mode approach has a range of 1-8% packet loss ratio and the single reactive mode approach has a range of 1-25% packet loss ratio. Also, in case of delay the improvement which was obtained from our approach scored an average reduction of 13% comparing with other tested schemes. Thus, these new and interesting technologies show an astonishing capability to add more efficiency in different types of Networks.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrunel University Londonen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/15737/1/FulltextThesis.pdf-
dc.subjectOpenFlowen_US
dc.subjectVirtual tenant networken_US
dc.subjectProactive modeen_US
dc.subjectSDNen_US
dc.subjectOpenDaylighten_US
dc.titlePerformance evaluation using multiple controllers with different flow setup modes in the software defined network architectureen_US
dc.title.alternativePerformance evaluation using multiple controllers modes for SDN architectureen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Electronic and Computer Engineering
Dept of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FulltextThesis.pdf2.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.