Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15687
Title: Responsiveness of auditors to the audit risk standards: Unique evidence from Big 4 audit firms
Authors: Niemi, L
Knechel, WR
Ojala, H
Collis, J
Issue Date: 7-Feb-2018
Citation: Niemi, L. et al. (2019) 'Responsiveness of auditors to the audit risk standards: Unique evidence from Big 4 audit firms', Accounting in Europe, 15 (1), pp. 33 - 54. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2018.1431398.
Abstract: We examine the effect of changes in audit risk standards on the conduct of financial statement audits in a European setting. We investigate this by analysing the audit hours and audit fees for clients of Big 4 audit firms in Finland in 1996 and 2010. Our results show that audit firms became more sensitive to clients’ business risk due to the introduction of the new audit risk standards, with more audit hours allocated to owner-managed companies in 2010 than in 1996, and fewer audit hours allocated to low-risk clients in 2010 than in 1996. Also, the labour mix in the audit team changed for owner-managed companies, with a greater work load carried by junior auditors in 2010 than in 1996. Regarding the price of audit, we find an increase in audit fees for clients with high business risk, while audit fees remained at roughly the same level for low-risk clients. These findings should be of interest to the auditing profession and those involved in the development of auditing regulations.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15687
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2018.1431398
ISSN: 1744-9480
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Jill Collis https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-3780
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2018 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Accounting in Europe on 07 Feb 2018, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17449480.2018.1431398. It is made available in this institutuonal repository under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent (see: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/research-impact/sharing-versions-of-journal-articles/).563.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons