Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1564
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartin, OV-
dc.contributor.authorShialis, T-
dc.contributor.authorLester, JN-
dc.contributor.authorScrimshaw, MD-
dc.contributor.authorBoobis, AR-
dc.contributor.authorVoulvoulis, N-
dc.coverage.spatial9en
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-28T09:23:25Z-
dc.date.available2008-01-28T09:23:25Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Health Perspectives 116: 149-157, Feb 2008en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1564-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Male reproductive tract abnormalities such as hypospadias and cryptorchidism, and testicular cancer have been proposed to comprise a common syndrome together with impaired spermatogenesis with a common etiology resulting from the disruption of gonadal development during fetal life, the testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS). The hypothesis that in utero exposure to estrogenic agents could induce these disorders was first proposed in 1993. The only quantitative summary estimate of the association between prenatal exposure to estrogenic agents and testicular cancer was published over 10 years ago, and other systematic reviews of the association between estrogenic compounds, other than the potent pharmaceutical estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES), and TDS end points have remained inconclusive. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of the association between the end points related to TDS and prenatal exposure to estrogenic agents. Inclusion in this analysis was based on mechanistic criteria, and the plausibility of an estrogen receptor (ER)-–mediated mode of action was specifically explored. RESULTS: We included in this meta-analysis eight studies investigating the etiology of hypospadias and/or cryptorchidism that had not been identified in previous systematic reviews. Four additional studies of pharmaceutical estrogens yielded a statistically significant updated summary estimate for testicular cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The doubling of the risk ratios for all three end points investigated after DES exposure is consistent with a shared etiology and the TDS hypothesis but does not constitute evidence of an estrogenic mode of action. Results of the subset analyses point to the existence of unidentified sources of heterogeneity between studies or within the study population.en
dc.format.extent159755 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciencesen
dc.subjectCryptorchidismen
dc.subjectDiethylstilbestrolen
dc.subjectEndocrine disruptionen
dc.subjectEnvironmenten
dc.subjectEstrogenen
dc.subjectHypospadiasen
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen
dc.subjectOral contraceptivesen
dc.subjectTesticular canceren
dc.subjectTesticular dysgenesisen
dc.titleTesticular dysgenesis syndrome and the estrogen hypothesis: A quantitative meta-analysisen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10545-
Appears in Collections:Environment
Institute for the Environment

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf156.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.