Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15054
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, CD-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, VJ-
dc.contributor.authorHeebner, NR-
dc.contributor.authorWohleber, MF-
dc.contributor.authorSimonson, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorRafferty, DM-
dc.contributor.authorReinert, A-
dc.contributor.authorSell, TC-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-23T11:39:55Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-04-
dc.date.available2017-08-23T11:39:55Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Sports Sciences, pp. 1 - 7: (2017)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0264-0414-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15054-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Jump landing tasks have been used to assess landing characteristics and require significant sensorimotor feedback to maintain functional joint stability (FJS) throughout the task. Postural stability (PS) also requires significant sensorimotor feedback and control and would seemingly involve similar sensory feedback pathways. However, previous literature clarifying the relationship between these two processes, maintaining FJS and PS, is limited. Participants: 80 Special Tactics Operators Methods: PS was assessed using the Sensory Organization Test (SOT). SOT variables included: Composite, Somatosensory, Visual, Vestibular, and Preference scores. Landing characteristics were assessed using motion analysis and during a double-legged (DLSJ) and single-legged (SLSJ) stop jump task. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between SOT scores and landing characteristics (α<.05) Results: For the DLSJ, significant correlations were found between: Composite and peak posterior ground reaction forces (-.257), Vestibular and peak knee abduction moment (-.237), and Preference and initial contact hip flexion (-.297), peak hip flexion (-.249). For the SLSJ, significant correlations were found between: Somatosensory and peak vertical ground reaction forces (-.246); Preference and initial contact hip flexion (-.295), peak hip flexion (-.262). Conclusions: The results indicate that the SOT may not be a sensitive enough tool to assess sensorimotor control in a healthy, athletic population.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 7-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectPostural Stabilityen_US
dc.subjectStop-jumpen_US
dc.subjectLanding Mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectSensory Organization Testen_US
dc.subjectSOTen_US
dc.titleRelationship of performance on the sensory organization test to landing characteristicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1363402-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Sports Sciences-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf332.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.