Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1496
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCraik, C-
dc.contributor.authorMcIntyre, A-
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, M-
dc.coverage.spatial6en
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-02T16:48:32Z-
dc.date.available2008-01-02T16:48:32Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationThe British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 67 (9) 404-407en
dc.identifier.issn0308-0226-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1496-
dc.description.abstractThe successful completion of practice placements is essential to the education of occupational therapists; however, ensuring quality placements is challenging for occupational therapy educators. In 2000, Brunel University introduced a revised system of accreditation of practice educators which involved attendance at a course, the supervision of a student and the submission of an essay to be assessed. An audit revealed that a total of 314 therapists attended 15 courses between 2000 and 2003; of these, 243 (77%) subsequently supervised students and 32 (10%) became accredited. The requirement to accredit practice educators, which is a commendable attempt to ensure quality, may paradoxically have been detrimental in achieving quality. The College of Occupational Therapists’ apparent change of emphasis on this topic is welcomeden
dc.format.extent140653 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherCollege of Occupational Therapistsen
dc.titleAccreditation of practice educators: An expectation too far ?en
dc.typeResearch Paperen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/030802260406700905-
Appears in Collections:Community Health and Public Health
Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf137.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.